-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
✨ add script to manually save CPU validation data #172
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
✨ add script to manually save CPU validation data #172
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Prashant Gupta <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Prashant Gupta <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Prashant Gupta <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Prashant Gupta <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Prashant Gupta <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Rafael Vasquez <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Prashant Gupta <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Prashant Gupta <[email protected]>
|
Needs multi-threaded working. @rafvasq will work on that |
|
@prashantgupta24 looks like an unused import: concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor Are we okay merging as-is without multithreading? I do prefer to:
Then I think it would be nice to add an entrypoint in pyproject.toml for this and a symlink in the top-level /scripts directory for congruency with the other scripts |
💯 It is working and seems the right approach. I'll comment the |
Signed-off-by: Prashant Gupta <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Prashant Gupta <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Prashant Gupta <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Prashant Gupta <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Prashant Gupta <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Prashant Gupta <[email protected]>
|
@Ssukriti can we get this merged in? This doesn't affect AFTU/DPP in any way. It will clear our path forward for PGTI |
Simple script to get CPU validation data from AFTU