Skip to content

Adding ffhl-gluon-mesh-batman-adv-brmldproxy#151

Closed
T-X wants to merge 1 commit intofreifunk-gluon:mainfrom
T-X:pr-ffhl-gluon-mesh-batman-adv-brmldproxy
Closed

Adding ffhl-gluon-mesh-batman-adv-brmldproxy#151
T-X wants to merge 1 commit intofreifunk-gluon:mainfrom
T-X:pr-ffhl-gluon-mesh-batman-adv-brmldproxy

Conversation

@T-X
Copy link
Contributor

@T-X T-X commented Feb 5, 2025

This is a copy of #2995 for the main Gluon repository:
-> freifunk-gluon/gluon#2995

@grische
Copy link
Contributor

grische commented Mar 10, 2025

As both PRs are still open, do you want to host the package here only temporarily? Or is this different to the Gluon PR?

@rotanid
Copy link
Member

rotanid commented Mar 10, 2025

we will adjust the shellcheck config in order to be similar to the main repository

@rotanid rotanid force-pushed the pr-ffhl-gluon-mesh-batman-adv-brmldproxy branch 2 times, most recently from 87939b0 to 0b60c27 Compare March 10, 2025 23:01
Copy link
Member

@rotanid rotanid left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@T-X i added a .shellcheckrc and fixed small issues, but one thing remains, please have a look

@rotanid rotanid force-pushed the pr-ffhl-gluon-mesh-batman-adv-brmldproxy branch 3 times, most recently from dc3fe82 to d72825b Compare March 11, 2025 00:16
@T-X T-X force-pushed the pr-ffhl-gluon-mesh-batman-adv-brmldproxy branch 2 times, most recently from fe9d26f to 1a3ab31 Compare April 7, 2025 15:41
@T-X T-X force-pushed the pr-ffhl-gluon-mesh-batman-adv-brmldproxy branch from b945785 to 25fe483 Compare April 10, 2025 00:37
@rotanid
Copy link
Member

rotanid commented Apr 11, 2025

@T-X do you want to merge it here or copy the code to these PRs:
freifunk-gluon/gluon#2995
freifunk-gluon/packages#264

on 2025-04-15 we decided on mumble meeting, that @neocturne will review this here but the merge will happen in the main repositories.

@neocturne
Copy link
Member

on 2025-04-15 we decided on mumble meeting, that @neocturne will review this here but the merge will happen in the main repositories.

Well, reviewing it here will have to do if the PR in the main repo is not up-to-date... but of course I'd prefer to review where we intend to merge it.

@rotanid rotanid requested a review from neocturne May 1, 2025 13:17
This is a copy of #2995 for the main Gluon repository:
-> freifunk-gluon/gluon#2995
@T-X T-X force-pushed the pr-ffhl-gluon-mesh-batman-adv-brmldproxy branch from 25fe483 to f3cd2db Compare May 1, 2025 13:37
@neocturne
Copy link
Member

I've never received a reply to my previous comment. We still intend to merge this to the Gluon main repo, right? Wouldn't it make more sense to close this PR then?

@rotanid
Copy link
Member

rotanid commented May 2, 2025

why would we discuss it again after having made a decision at the meeting? i don't get it, but in the end i don't care much i just wanted to push it forward without having personal interest in the change.

@neocturne
Copy link
Member

I thought we decided that this PR only made sense because we hadn't fixed our lints in the main repo.

@T-X
Copy link
Contributor Author

T-X commented May 3, 2025

My motivation for this PR was that I wasn't sure how long it would take to be integrated into the main repository. And wanted to add here quickly what we are basically already using in Lübeck. While I would still prefer getting this into the main repository eventually.

We've had some early reviewing in the freifunk-gluon/gluon#2995 PR and then later some linting/style reviewing here. The reviewing split is confusing and unfortunate, sorry about that, but happened because we unintentionally had no linting for the official packages repository and diverging linting checks between this community packages repository and the main repository. This should hopefully be fixed now.

My suggestion would be to hit the merge button here now unless someone sees some further issues in regards to community packages guideline. Then I'd sync the latest style changes / lint fixes to freifunk-gluon/gluon#2995. And we then continue reviewing over there? And once it's merged in the main repository eventually I'd file another PR to remove it again here in community packages.

Does that make sense?

@citronalco
Copy link

citronalco commented Jul 26, 2025

I just stumbled over this PR, which seems to be stuck, unfortunately.
Maybe the notifications caused by my comment bring back some life.

@T-X In the Makefile's package description, could you please note that filter_membership_reports is true by default?

@T-X
Copy link
Contributor Author

T-X commented Aug 4, 2025

I just stumbled over this PR, which seems to be stuck, unfortunately. Maybe the notifications caused by my comment bring back some life.

@T-X In the Makefile's package description, could you please note that filter_membership_reports is true by default?

Hi @citronalco, thanks for your interest. I think I did mention that?

If filter_membership_reports is true in the site.conf *or absent* then [...]

Also I think further discussion will continue in the PR for an official Gluon main addition: freifunk-gluon/gluon#2995, not here.

@rotanid
Copy link
Member

rotanid commented Oct 14, 2025

replaced by
freifunk-gluon/packages#264

@rotanid rotanid closed this Oct 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants