Skip to content

Conversation

@ShalokShalom
Copy link
Contributor

@ShalokShalom ShalokShalom commented Oct 28, 2025

This fixes the currently broken link to the Components folder.

Two questions:

Is it welcome to also add a bit of a welcoming text to its README? - since that one is currently empty.

And can somebody please tell me, what ctx is supposed to mean?

That is written all over the place, and I don't see it explained at all.

Especially to understand something critical as the initial example, should that be clear.

I would prefer a non-abbreviated name, since that is clear to everybody.

Cheers ✨

This fixes the currently broken link to the Components folder.

Two questions: Is it welcome to also add a bit of a welcoming text to its README - since that one is currently empty.

And 2. Can somebody tell me, what the heck `ctx` is supposed to mean?

That is written all over the place, and I don't see it explained at all.

Especially to understand something critical as the initial example, should that be clear.

I would prefer a non-abbreviated name for something like that, personally.
@JaggerJo
Copy link
Member

Hey @ShalokShalom

Is it welcome to also add a bit of a welcoming text to its README? - since that one is currently empty.

Sure, go ahead 👍

And can somebody please tell me, what ctx is supposed to mean?

ctx = context / component context

@ShalokShalom
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ok, I wanna do this in a separate PR, so maybe we can merge this one.

@JaggerJo JaggerJo merged commit 27d2b45 into fsprojects:master Oct 29, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants