Remove path_prefix from TES specification #195
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
MattMcL4475
changed the title
|
It appears that #194 isn't entirely settled. This should be deferred until the final resolution is determined. |
9 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
path_prefixas currently defined in the specification is ambiguous. It is also a convenience feature, since the local filesystem can be reorganized as needed either by including additional bash commands in the taskcommandor by including additional executors. Therefore, we propose removing it from the specification, as the result of a conversation between @giventocode @vsmalladi @uniqueg @kellrott on 8/17/2023Addresses: #194