Skip to content

Revert "chore(actions): bump actions/checkout from 5 to 6"#360

Merged
gaissmai merged 1 commit intomainfrom
revert
Nov 26, 2025
Merged

Revert "chore(actions): bump actions/checkout from 5 to 6"#360
gaissmai merged 1 commit intomainfrom
revert

Conversation

@gaissmai
Copy link
Owner

@gaissmai gaissmai commented Nov 26, 2025

govulncheck is broken

This reverts commit 03ae78d.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated CI/CD workflow dependencies across test, coverage, and linting jobs.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

govulncheck is broken

This reverts commit 03ae78d.
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 26, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request downgrades the GitHub Actions checkout action from version 6 to version 5 across multiple workflow jobs in the Go workflow file. No workflow logic or control flow is modified; only the action version is changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
GitHub Actions version downgrade
\.github/workflows/go\.yml
Replaced all instances of actions/checkout@v6 with actions/checkout@v5 across test, govulncheck, coverage, and linting jobs

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • Verify that the version downgrade from v6 to v5 was intentional and necessary
  • Confirm all job references were updated consistently (test, govulncheck, coverage, linting)

Poem

🐰 A hop backward through versions we go,
From v6 to v5, steady and slow,
The workflow still checks, no logic does break,
Just a version tweak for caution's sake!

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch revert

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 03ae78d and 34c2f57.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/go.yml (4 hunks)

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

  • Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
  • Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
  • Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

  1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
  2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
  3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
  4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
    | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
  5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
    Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 19715703690

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.01%) to 91.244%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 19681765927: 0.01%
Covered Lines: 6888
Relevant Lines: 7549

💛 - Coveralls

@gaissmai gaissmai merged commit 0e10d6e into main Nov 26, 2025
10 of 11 checks passed
@gaissmai gaissmai deleted the revert branch November 26, 2025 19:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants