Update residual-layers.lua to be consistent with other torch nn models - #6
Open
lim0606 wants to merge 3 commits into
Open
Update residual-layers.lua to be consistent with other torch nn models#6lim0606 wants to merge 3 commits into
lim0606 wants to merge 3 commits into
Conversation
Owner
|
I see! Thank you -- I wasn't sure how to express this network in the usual Torch way, so I had to use the |
Author
|
I just meant that the modification intended to make the layer be look-alike some tutorials in https://github.com/torch/torch7/wiki/Cheatsheet, e.g. https://github.com/soumith/imagenet-multiGPU.torch. Thank you :) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi,
I updated residual-layers.lua so that it can be used with other available layers in torch community.
I thought this might be useful for someone who might want to use the residual layer in their network architecture.
This might be not the preferred way of @gcr.
Anyway, thank you for sharing your review work.
Best regards,
Jaehyun
This change is