Fix our use of yq

[filiptronicek]

Description

Looks like yq got updated under our feet somehow. This PR makes sure that doesn't scare us too much

[geropl]

@filiptronicek Looks like the version bump from 3 -> 4.

Before, we would have explicit names e.g. yq4 in some places.

If we update this:

• How do we make sure we don't break customers?
• How do we make sure we don't break ourselves?

IMO it would be worth investigating where exactly the bump is coming from, just to make sure we are aligned with the wider ecosystem 👍

[filiptronicek]

@geropl you've got a very good point – thanks for stopping by and raising it. Turns out, this was actually happening because of my dotfiles installing yq through nix, which actually meant that yq was at version 3.4.3! (and not 4.22.1, as our ws image provides).

Blaming it all on Nix for not having up-to-date pkgs :P

[geropl]

Turns out, this was actually happening because of my dotfiles installing yq through nix, which actually meant that yq was at version 3.4.3! (and not 4.22.1, as our ws image provides).

Wow, that was actually unexpected - thanks for figuring that out! 💪