Add custom webhook json

[priyanshu6238]

Summary:
Add custom webhook json
for more details - glific/floweditor#194
flow editor pr: glific/floweditor#193

Added a custom webhook JSON. In the frontend, when a user selects it from the dropdown, the option becomes editable, allowing both the label name and the body to be edited in this option

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new webhook entry named "custom_webhook" is added to the webhook.json configuration file. The entry contains an empty JSON body and specifies the Content-Type header as application/json. It is positioned after the existing "create_certificate" entry within the webhook array, extending the list of available webhook handlers.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• JSON for webhook node #4473: Introduces the webhook.json file structure that is being extended by this PR with the new "custom_webhook" entry.
• Fix/webhook json #4597: Standardizes webhook payload formats in webhook.json, relevant to maintaining consistency with the newly added webhook entry.

Suggested reviewers

• madclaws
• shijithkjayan
• AmishaBisht

Poem

🐰 A webhook hops into our flows so bright,
Custom and ready, Content-Type just right,
Empty and eager, awaiting its call,
Our JSON array grows proud and tall!

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'Add custom webhook json' directly describes the main change: adding a new custom_webhook entry to webhook.json.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Description check	✅ Passed	The pull request description clearly relates to the changeset, explaining the addition of a custom webhook JSON entry and its intended frontend functionality.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

priv/data/flows/webhook.json (1)

80-86: Add response format example for consistency and clarify the webhook's purpose.

The new "custom_webhook" entry is missing a response_format_example field that all other webhook entries include. This field serves as important documentation for users to understand the expected response structure.

Additionally:

• The empty body "{}" appears intentional for a customizable template, but this should be verified.
• The purpose and use case for this webhook are not documented in the PR description. Consider adding:
  • Documentation explaining when and how to use this webhook
  • Example use cases or scenarios
  • Whether this is meant as a user-customizable template

🔎 Suggested addition

   {
     "name": "custom_webhook",
     "body": "{}",
     "headers": {
       "Content-Type": "application/json"
-    }
+    },
+    "response_format_example": "{\"success\": true, \"message\": \"Custom webhook response\"}"
   }

Verification questions:

1. Is the empty body "{}" intentional for user customization?
2. What is the intended use case for this webhook?
3. Should there be accompanying documentation explaining how users should customize this webhook?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: https://storage.googleapis.com/cc-tides/glific_v2/.coderabbit.yaml (via .coderabbit.yaml)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 961a23b and 9c4af68.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• priv/data/flows/webhook.json

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)

• GitHub Check: test (1.18.3, 27.3.3)

[shijithkjayan]

What the need for custom webhook?

[priyanshu6238]

Done: All attachments have been added to the issue and the Flow Editor PR

[priyanshu6238]

glific/floweditor#194

[shijithkjayan]

Please create a ticket for this and also add a proper description for the PR @priyanshu6238

[priyanshu6238]

closeing this will immediately make the custom method available in the dropdown while the user is label is not present in the dropdown