process: IP Whitelisting #175
Conversation
hythloda
requested review from
isegall-da,
stas-sbi,
tkatrichenko and
waynecollier-da
|
@nikowatari can you review this SV process please? |
|
I slacked and emailed @nikowatari the reminder of this one. |
|
How is this different from https://github.com/global-synchronizer-foundation/configs/blob/main/processes/new-whitelisted-ip.md ? |
waynecollier-da
left a comment
waynecollier-da
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@isegall-da Can you take a look? I'm not sure I know exactly where to say both SV Sponsor and Node as a Service provider, versus just SV Sponsor
|
@hythloda I agree with @stas-sbi that seems to have too much intersection with https://github.com/global-synchronizer-foundation/configs/blob/main/processes/new-whitelisted-ip.md, seems like the two should be merged. On SV sponsor vs node operator, I'm thinking maybe we just need to make the distinction at the highest level, so something like: |
Co-authored-by: Wayne Collier <wayne.collier@digitalasset.com> Signed-off-by: Amanda L Martin <hythloda@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Amanda L Martin <hythloda@gmail.com>
isegall-da
left a comment
isegall-da
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good, thank you
No description provided.