-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 440
fix(gnovm): Add debug panic on Deepfill execution on constant type
#4891
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
Davphla
wants to merge
5
commits into
gnolang:master
Choose a base branch
from
Davphla:fix/deepfill
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5e351c4
fix(gnovm): Concerns regarding the DeepFill method #4777
Davphla 44cb235
test(gnolang): add unit tests for Constant DeepFill method in value t…
Davphla d30f4e1
Merge branch 'master' into fix/deepfill
Davphla 2b0ae1d
failing CI
Davphla f51c7c8
Revert "failing CI"
Davphla File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ | ||
| package gnolang | ||
|
|
||
| import ( | ||
| "testing" | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| func TestConstantValuesDeepFill(t *testing.T) { | ||
| sv := StringValue("test") | ||
| if result := sv.DeepFill(nil); result != sv { | ||
| t.Errorf("StringValue.DeepFill: expected %v, got %v", sv, result) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| biv := BigintValue{} | ||
| if result := biv.DeepFill(nil); result != biv { | ||
| t.Errorf("BigintValue.DeepFill: expected %v, got %v", biv, result) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| bdv := BigdecValue{} | ||
| if result := bdv.DeepFill(nil); result != bdv { | ||
| t.Errorf("BigdecValue.DeepFill: expected %v, got %v", bdv, result) | ||
| } | ||
| } |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why not just make these panic?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This may cause involuntary informational panic, so I think it is safer to have a potential optimization then an accidental panic.
As well, it break tests 2b0ae1d
Failing test: https://github.com/gnolang/gno/actions/runs/19742512315/job/56569620776#step:5:10
Should the failing tests be considered in that PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If it's not intended to happen, then it won't be "informational".
But by seeing the test results, it looks like either the behaviour is incorrect in the callers; or it would be incorrect to have a panic here