Skip to content

Conversation

@tbruyelle
Copy link
Contributor

This change contains #4868 since I need to use the -send flag in maketx run to write the tests. I will rebase and target the main repo once #4868 is merged. Until this happen this PR will set be draft.

Closes gnolang#4866

Added a txtar test to ensure that -send flag doesnt affect the user
balance when used in `maketx run`.

Added similar txtar for `maketx call`, this time the user balance is
affected.
@github-actions github-actions bot added 📦 🤖 gnovm Issues or PRs gnovm related 📦 ⛰️ gno.land Issues or PRs gno.land package related labels Nov 27, 2025
@Gno2D2 Gno2D2 added the review/triage-pending PRs opened by external contributors that are waiting for the 1st review label Nov 27, 2025
@Gno2D2
Copy link
Collaborator

Gno2D2 commented Nov 27, 2025

🛠 PR Checks Summary

🔴 Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff

Manual Checks (for Reviewers):
  • IGNORE the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)
Read More

🤖 This bot helps streamline PR reviews by verifying automated checks and providing guidance for contributors and reviewers.

✅ Automated Checks (for Contributors):

🟢 Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info)
🔴 Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff

☑️ Contributor Actions:
  1. Fix any issues flagged by automated checks.
  2. Follow the Contributor Checklist to ensure your PR is ready for review.
    • Add new tests, or document why they are unnecessary.
    • Provide clear examples/screenshots, if necessary.
    • Update documentation, if required.
    • Ensure no breaking changes, or include BREAKING CHANGE notes.
    • Link related issues/PRs, where applicable.
☑️ Reviewer Actions:
  1. Complete manual checks for the PR, including the guidelines and additional checks if applicable.
📚 Resources:
Debug
Automated Checks
Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info)

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$
    └── 🟢 The pull request was created from a fork (head branch repo: tbruyelle/gno)

Then

🟢 Requirement satisfied
└── 🟢 Maintainer can modify this pull request

Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$
    └── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is a member of the team: tech-staff)

Then

🔴 Requirement not satisfied
└── 🔴 If
    ├── 🔴 Condition
    │   └── 🔴 Or
    │       ├── 🔴 At least one of these user(s) reviewed the pull request: [jefft0 leohhhn n0izn0iz notJoon omarsy x1unix] (with state "APPROVED")
    │       ├── 🔴 At least 1 user(s) of the team tech-staff reviewed pull request
    │       └── 🔴 This pull request is a draft
    └── 🔴 Else
        └── 🔴 And
            ├── 🟢 This label is applied to pull request: review/triage-pending
            └── 🔴 On no pull request

Manual Checks
**IGNORE** the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 On every pull request

Can be checked by

  • Any user with comment edit permission

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 27, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 57.14286% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
gnovm/stdlibs/chain/banker/banker.go 36.36% 7 Missing ⚠️
gno.land/pkg/keyscli/run.go 80.00% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@moul
Copy link
Member

moul commented Nov 28, 2025

Related #4868 (comment)

@moul moul requested review from jaekwon and moul November 28, 2025 20:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

📦 ⛰️ gno.land Issues or PRs gno.land package related 📦 🤖 gnovm Issues or PRs gnovm related review/triage-pending PRs opened by external contributors that are waiting for the 1st review

Projects

Status: No status
Status: Triage

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants