Skip to content

Conversation

@MikaelVallenet
Copy link
Member

fix #5023

@github-actions github-actions bot added the 📖 documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jan 6, 2026
@Gno2D2 Gno2D2 requested a review from a team January 6, 2026 13:28
@Gno2D2 Gno2D2 added the review/triage-pending PRs opened by external contributors that are waiting for the 1st review label Jan 6, 2026
@Gno2D2
Copy link
Collaborator

Gno2D2 commented Jan 6, 2026

🛠 PR Checks Summary

🔴 Changes to 'docs' folder must be reviewed/authored by at least one devrel and one tech-staff

Manual Checks (for Reviewers):
  • IGNORE the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)
Read More

🤖 This bot helps streamline PR reviews by verifying automated checks and providing guidance for contributors and reviewers.

✅ Automated Checks (for Contributors):

🟢 Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info)
🔴 Changes to 'docs' folder must be reviewed/authored by at least one devrel and one tech-staff
🟢 Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff

☑️ Contributor Actions:
  1. Fix any issues flagged by automated checks.
  2. Follow the Contributor Checklist to ensure your PR is ready for review.
    • Add new tests, or document why they are unnecessary.
    • Provide clear examples/screenshots, if necessary.
    • Update documentation, if required.
    • Ensure no breaking changes, or include BREAKING CHANGE notes.
    • Link related issues/PRs, where applicable.
☑️ Reviewer Actions:
  1. Complete manual checks for the PR, including the guidelines and additional checks if applicable.
📚 Resources:
Debug
Automated Checks
Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info)

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$
    └── 🟢 The pull request was created from a fork (head branch repo: MikaelVallenet/gno)

Then

🟢 Requirement satisfied
└── 🟢 Maintainer can modify this pull request

Changes to 'docs' folder must be reviewed/authored by at least one devrel and one tech-staff

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$
    └── 🟢 A changed file matches this pattern: ^docs/ (filename: docs/resources/comparison-of-ways-to-interact-with-gnoland.md)

Then

🔴 Requirement not satisfied
└── 🔴 And
    ├── 🟢 Or
    │   ├── 🔴 Pull request author is a member of the team: tech-staff
    │   └── 🟢 At least 1 user(s) of the team tech-staff reviewed pull request(with state "APPROVED")
    └── 🔴 Or
        ├── 🔴 Pull request author is a member of the team: devrels
        └── 🔴 At least 1 user(s) of the team devrels reviewed pull request(with state "APPROVED")

Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$
    └── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is a member of the team: tech-staff)

Then

🟢 Requirement satisfied
└── 🟢 If
    ├── 🟢 Condition
    │   └── 🟢 Or
    │       ├── 🔴 At least one of these user(s) reviewed the pull request: [jefft0 notJoon omarsy MikaelVallenet] (with state "APPROVED")
    │       ├── 🟢 At least 1 user(s) of the team tech-staff reviewed pull request
    │       └── 🔴 This pull request is a draft
    └── 🟢 Then
        └── 🟢 Not (🔴 This label is applied to pull request: review/triage-pending)

Manual Checks
**IGNORE** the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 On every pull request

Can be checked by

  • Any user with comment edit permission

Copy link
Contributor

@Davphla Davphla left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, I couldn't find more dead links as well

@Kouteki Kouteki moved this from Triage to In Review in 🧙‍♂️Gno.land development Jan 13, 2026
@Kouteki Kouteki removed the request for review from a team January 13, 2026 12:10
@Kouteki Kouteki requested review from ajnavarro and moul January 13, 2026 12:34
@Gno2D2 Gno2D2 requested a review from a team January 13, 2026 12:34
@Gno2D2 Gno2D2 removed the review/triage-pending PRs opened by external contributors that are waiting for the 1st review label Jan 13, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

📖 documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

Status: No status
Status: In Review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

docs: incorrect relative link in the deployed documentation

5 participants