-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 78
Simplify IntDomTuple
witness invariants
#1517
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
62f01a9
Add cram test for int witness invariants
sim642 ca5f064
Extract inclusion list invariant in IntDomain
sim642 e767f90
Simplify inclusion list invariants
sim642 176941d
Extract definite int invariant in IntDomain
sim642 250196b
Extract interval invariant in IntDomain
sim642 9a25b48
Extract exclusion list invariant in IntDomain
sim642 d1f04bc
Simplify interval and exclusion list invariants
sim642 39f6c2d
Deduplicate inclusion list elements in IntDomTuple
sim642 2408ab6
Filter out-of-invariant exclusion list elements in IntDomTuple invariant
sim642 0a27c74
Document nicer IntDomTuple invariant
sim642 02ef2f9
Disable interval set in witness int invariant cram test
sim642 56ed7b5
Add option ana.base.invariant.int.simplify
sim642 40b3434
Add TODOs about IntDomain refinement
sim642 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What do you think of doing a single refine call before generating invariant? This would ensure things such as inclusion sets being more precise than intervals etc.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I looked at it now and the refinement wouldn't actually ensure that because we're missing a number of refinement directions at least. I added some TODOs about them.