Skip to content

Conversation

@sim642
Copy link
Member

@sim642 sim642 commented Nov 28, 2025

This is likely to change in the future, so it's better for the old reference confs to be explicit about it.

More importantly, PR #1777 changed the default behavior of malloc(0) which accidentally affected svcomp26. We made the default sound (unlike sem.malloc.fail) but didn't override it for svcomp26. Hopefully this oversight doesn't cost us too many points...

This is likely to change in the future, so it's better for the old reference confs to be explicit about it.
More importantly, PR #1777 changed the default behavior of malloc(0) which accidentally affected svcomp26.
@sim642 sim642 added the sv-comp SV-COMP (analyses, results), witnesses label Nov 28, 2025
@sim642
Copy link
Member Author

sim642 commented Dec 1, 2025

Hopefully this oversight doesn't cost us too many points...

On level01 with 60s and 1GB this affected three tasks:

  1. c/ldv-regression/rule57_ebda_blast.c_1.i
  2. c/ldv-regression/rule57_ebda_blast.i
  3. c/loop-lit/mcmillan2006.i

@sim642 sim642 added this to the SV-COMP 2027 milestone Dec 1, 2025
@sim642 sim642 merged commit c286cce into master Dec 1, 2025
19 checks passed
@sim642 sim642 deleted the svcomp-conf-explicit-malloc-fail branch December 1, 2025 10:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

sv-comp SV-COMP (analyses, results), witnesses

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant