Skip to content

Update Dictionary class reference about typed dictionaries #106520

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

GlitchedCode922
Copy link
Contributor

@GlitchedCode922 GlitchedCode922 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 17, 2025 09:56
@Chaosus Chaosus added this to the 4.5 milestone May 17, 2025
Copy link
Member

@Mickeon Mickeon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is hasty. In the PR there's no explanation for typed dictionaries. It's confusing to just provide examples in the leading description. This doesn't solve the linked issue.

Note that Array's class reference also has the same "problem", but there, the concept of a "typed array" is thoroughly explained in its corresponding constructor. I would heavily suggest taking inspiration from that.

@Mickeon Mickeon modified the milestones: 4.5, 4.x May 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Outdated Documentation Dictionaries (missing documentation about the new typed Dictionaries)
3 participants