Skip to content

Add optimized ParseUint - #128

Closed
ReneWerner87 wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
codex/2025-07-09-08-25-18
Closed

Add optimized ParseUint#128
ReneWerner87 wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
codex/2025-07-09-08-25-18

Conversation

@ReneWerner87

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • add ParseUint for parsing unsigned integers faster than strconv.ParseUint
  • benchmark new function vs standard library
  • document results in README

Testing

  • go test ./... -run . -count=1
  • go test ./... -bench=ParseUint -benchmem -run=^$ -count=2

https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_686e19a07664832684ed066f531079c6

@ReneWerner87
ReneWerner87 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 9, 2025 08:25
@ReneWerner87
ReneWerner87 requested review from efectn, gaby and sixcolors and removed request for a team July 9, 2025 08:25
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 9, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@ReneWerner87 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 1 minutes and 59 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e4422da and fa83e89.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • numbers.go (1 hunks)
  • numbers_test.go (1 hunks)
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/2025-07-09-08-25-18

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @ReneWerner87, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a custom, highly optimized utility function for parsing unsigned integers, aiming to provide a faster alternative to the standard library's strconv.ParseUint. It includes thorough testing and benchmarking to validate its correctness and demonstrate its performance benefits, with the results documented for easy reference.

Highlights

  • Performance Optimization: Introduced a new ParseUint function designed to parse unsigned integers more efficiently than the standard library's strconv.ParseUint.
  • Benchmarking & Validation: Added comprehensive benchmarks comparing the new ParseUint function's performance against strconv.ParseUint, demonstrating significant speed improvements.
  • Documentation Update: Updated the README.md to include the benchmark results, providing clear evidence of the performance gains achieved by the new parsing function.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 9, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.00%. Comparing base (844d4de) to head (fa83e89).
Report is 16 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #128      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.44%   96.00%   -0.45%     
==========================================
  Files           9       10       +1     
  Lines         507      525      +18     
==========================================
+ Hits          489      504      +15     
- Misses         12       14       +2     
- Partials        6        7       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 96.00% <100.00%> (-0.45%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request introduces an optimized ParseUint function for parsing unsigned integers, along with benchmarks and tests. A potential improvement is suggested to simplify the overflow check in the ParseUint function for better readability and performance.

Comment thread numbers.go
Comment on lines +26 to +27
if n > maxUint64Div10 || (n == maxUint64Div10 && uint64(c-'0') > maxUint64Mod10) {
return 0, strconv.ErrRange

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The overflow check can be simplified by combining the conditions into a single check. This improves readability and might slightly improve performance by avoiding the second condition check when the first one fails.

Suggested change
if n > maxUint64Div10 || (n == maxUint64Div10 && uint64(c-'0') > maxUint64Mod10) {
return 0, strconv.ErrRange
if n > maxUint64Div10 || n*10 > maxUint64-uint64(c-'0') {
return 0, strconv.ErrRange
}

Comment thread numbers.go
// ParseUint parses a decimal ASCII representation of an unsigned integer.
// It returns an error if the input contains non-digit characters or
// the value overflows uint64.
func ParseUint[S ~string | ~[]byte](s S) (uint64, error) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we do the same by adding ParseInt() ?

Comment thread numbers_test.go
}

func Benchmark_ParseUint(b *testing.B) {
str := "1234567890"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This value falls under Int, not Uint. It's too small

@gaby
gaby deleted the codex/2025-07-09-08-25-18 branch July 11, 2026 20:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants