Skip to content

fix: Remove focus before taking a screenshot in AddGranteeBase #6233

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jkbmat
Copy link
Contributor

@jkbmat jkbmat commented Apr 15, 2025

risk: nonprod
JIRA: LX-729


Important

Please, don't forget to run rush change for the commits that introduce new features or significant changes 🙏 This information is used to generate the change log.


Run extended test by pull request comment

Commands can be triggered by posting a comment with specific text on the pull request. It is possible to trigger multiple commands simultaneously.

extended-test --backstop | --integrated | --isolated | --record [--filter <file1>,<file2>,...,<fileN>]

Explanation

  • --backstop The command to run screen tests (optionally with keeping passing screenshots).
  • --integrated The command to run integrated tests against the live backend.
  • --isolated The command to run isolated tests against recordings.
  • --record The command to create new recordings for isolated tests.
  • --filter (Optional) A comma-separated list of test files to run. This parameter is valid only for the --integrated, --isolated, and --record commands.

Examples

extended-test --backstop
extended-test --backstop --keep-passing-screenshots
extended-test --integrated
extended-test --integrated --filter test1.spec.ts,test2.spec.ts
extended-test --isolated
extended-test --isolated --filter test1.spec.ts,test2.spec.ts
extended-test --record
extended-test --record --filter test1.spec.ts,test2.spec.ts

Commands for Bear platform working on branch rel/9.9

extended-test-legacy --backstop
extended-test-legacy --isolated
extended-test-legacy --record

@jkbmat jkbmat self-assigned this Apr 15, 2025
@jkbmat
Copy link
Contributor Author

jkbmat commented Apr 15, 2025

extended-test --backstop

Copy link

"extended-test --backstop" started. Check the progress here.

Copy link

❌ "extended-test --backstop" finished with result failure. Check the results here.

@jkbmat jkbmat force-pushed the cjma-LX-729-backstop-focus branch from 522971c to 9bd43ae Compare April 15, 2025 14:57
@jkbmat
Copy link
Contributor Author

jkbmat commented Apr 15, 2025

extended-test --backstop

Copy link

"extended-test --backstop" started. Check the progress here.

Copy link

❌ "extended-test --backstop" finished with result failure. Check the results here.

@jkbmat jkbmat force-pushed the cjma-LX-729-backstop-focus branch from 9bd43ae to f80e72e Compare April 16, 2025 06:37
@jkbmat
Copy link
Contributor Author

jkbmat commented Apr 16, 2025

extended-test --backstop

Copy link

"extended-test --backstop" started. Check the progress here.

Copy link

❌ "extended-test --backstop" finished with result failure. Check the results here.

@jkbmat jkbmat force-pushed the cjma-LX-729-backstop-focus branch from f80e72e to 52b9840 Compare April 16, 2025 08:21
@jkbmat
Copy link
Contributor Author

jkbmat commented Apr 16, 2025

extended-test --backstop

Copy link

"extended-test --backstop" started. Check the progress here.

Copy link

❌ "extended-test --backstop" finished with result failure. Check the results here.

@jkbmat jkbmat force-pushed the cjma-LX-729-backstop-focus branch from 52b9840 to 4554eff Compare April 16, 2025 09:08
@jkbmat
Copy link
Contributor Author

jkbmat commented Apr 16, 2025

extended-test --backstop

Copy link

"extended-test --backstop" started. Check the progress here.

Copy link

✅ "extended-test --backstop" finished with result success. Check the results here.

@jkbmat
Copy link
Contributor Author

jkbmat commented Apr 16, 2025

extended-test --backstop --keep-passing-screenshots

Copy link

"extended-test --backstop --keep-passing-screenshots" started. Check the progress here.

Copy link

✅ "extended-test --backstop --keep-passing-screenshots" finished with result success. Check the results here.

@jkbmat jkbmat force-pushed the cjma-LX-729-backstop-focus branch from 4554eff to 5788354 Compare April 16, 2025 12:49
@jkbmat
Copy link
Contributor Author

jkbmat commented Apr 16, 2025

extended-test --backstop --keep-passing-screenshots

Copy link

"extended-test --backstop --keep-passing-screenshots" started. Check the progress here.

Copy link

❌ "extended-test --backstop --keep-passing-screenshots" finished with result failure. Check the results here.

@jkbmat jkbmat force-pushed the cjma-LX-729-backstop-focus branch from 5788354 to 9e621b9 Compare April 16, 2025 13:51
@jkbmat
Copy link
Contributor Author

jkbmat commented Apr 16, 2025

extended-test --backstop --keep-passing-screenshots

Copy link

"extended-test --backstop --keep-passing-screenshots" started. Check the progress here.

Copy link

"extended-test --backstop --keep-passing-screenshots" started. Check the progress here.

Copy link

❌ "extended-test --backstop --keep-passing-screenshots" finished with result failure. Check the results here.

@jkbmat jkbmat force-pushed the cjma-LX-729-backstop-focus branch from f96b33f to f4ce7f5 Compare April 17, 2025 08:26
@jkbmat
Copy link
Contributor Author

jkbmat commented Apr 17, 2025

extended-test --backstop --keep-passing-screenshots

Copy link

"extended-test --backstop --keep-passing-screenshots" started. Check the progress here.

Copy link

✅ "extended-test --backstop --keep-passing-screenshots" finished with result success. Check the results here.

@jkbmat jkbmat force-pushed the cjma-LX-729-backstop-focus branch 2 times, most recently from 3b05299 to 0393002 Compare April 17, 2025 09:01
@jkbmat jkbmat marked this pull request as ready for review April 17, 2025 09:02
@jkbmat jkbmat requested a review from kandl as a code owner April 17, 2025 09:02
@jkbmat jkbmat requested a review from ivan-nejezchleb April 17, 2025 09:03
@jkbmat jkbmat force-pushed the cjma-LX-729-backstop-focus branch from 0393002 to c6f315b Compare April 17, 2025 09:35
@jkbmat
Copy link
Contributor Author

jkbmat commented Apr 17, 2025

extended-test --backstop --keep-passing-screenshots

Copy link

"extended-test --backstop --keep-passing-screenshots" started. Check the progress here.

Copy link

❌ "extended-test --backstop --keep-passing-screenshots" finished with result failure. Check the results here.

@jkbmat
Copy link
Contributor Author

jkbmat commented Apr 17, 2025

extended-test --backstop --keep-passing-screenshots

Copy link

"extended-test --backstop --keep-passing-screenshots" started. Check the progress here.

@jkbmat jkbmat force-pushed the cjma-LX-729-backstop-focus branch from c6f315b to 6cac590 Compare April 17, 2025 11:09
@jkbmat
Copy link
Contributor Author

jkbmat commented Apr 17, 2025

extended-test --backstop --keep-passing-screenshots

Copy link

"extended-test --backstop --keep-passing-screenshots" started. Check the progress here.

Copy link

❌ "extended-test --backstop --keep-passing-screenshots" finished with result failure. Check the results here.

@jkbmat
Copy link
Contributor Author

jkbmat commented Apr 17, 2025

extended-test --backstop --keep-passing-screenshots

Copy link

"extended-test --backstop --keep-passing-screenshots" started. Check the progress here.

Copy link

✅ "extended-test --backstop --keep-passing-screenshots" finished with result success. Check the results here.

@jkbmat jkbmat force-pushed the cjma-LX-729-backstop-focus branch 2 times, most recently from 8066444 to 0393002 Compare April 17, 2025 12:26
@jkbmat jkbmat force-pushed the cjma-LX-729-backstop-focus branch from 0393002 to ea079bc Compare April 17, 2025 12:26
@ivanmjartan
Copy link
Contributor

You need to create PR from upstream not from your fork this Jenkinc call will not work (FOSSA check)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants