feat: cuboid conjectures #1850
Open
feat: cuboid conjectures #1850
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
YaelDillies
reviewed
Jan 22, 2026
YaelDillies
added
the
awaiting-author
Member
|
Can you make sure all defs have docstrings? |
Co-authored-by: Yaël Dillies <yael.dillies@gmail.com>
Paul-Lez
reviewed
Jan 22, 2026
YaelDillies
reviewed
Jan 23, 2026
Co-authored-by: Yaël Dillies <yael.dillies@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #1785.
Unfortunately, the conjectures are not very readable in Lean.
I double checked the coefficients and they should be correct.
If someone knows how to get rid of the
(R := ℤ), this would be nice.Finally, it is unclear if for the third conjecture the author (source is: https://matem.anrb.ru/sites/default/files/files/vupe27/Sharipov.pdf) means "pairwise coprime" or "coprime" (i.e. there is no prime dividing all three). I think it is the latter, but I could be wrong.