Skip to content

Conversation

@FaragElsayed2
Copy link
Collaborator

Updating SRAM docs with minor change

Fixes #10

@FaragElsayed2
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Cc @atorkmabrains

I have updated Address Input width for some SRAM cells after reviewing it in the original documentation.

@atorkmabrains
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks @FaragElsayed2

Copy link
Collaborator

@atorkmabrains atorkmabrains left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@atorkmabrains atorkmabrains requested review from mithro and proppy April 10, 2023 08:26
@atorkmabrains
Copy link
Collaborator

@mithro @proppy Could you please approve?

@TrevorPeyton
Copy link

Poking this for future users. Looks like it just needs a README for this to go through. I spent a good amount of time trying to figure this out only to find that the documentation has the incorrect address bit listings!

@RTimothyEdwards
Copy link
Collaborator

I do not believe that this repository is actively maintained. I could copy it over to fossi-foundation with the other ones that have been moved there, and maintain it myself.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Incorrect Address width in descriptions for 3 SRAM modules

4 participants