Skip to content

Conversation

@tonycoco
Copy link
Collaborator

@tonycoco tonycoco commented Dec 1, 2025

No description provided.

@sofisl
Copy link
Collaborator

sofisl commented Dec 1, 2025

@cstrahan, thank you for opening your PR! We don't run tests from forks, do you think you could contribute to this PR to get the changes in? Currently I see it's failing node 18 because of a dependency that requires node 20. I think the easiest thing would be to fix that specific dependency, or else migrate this library to node 20 (which I think is too laborious for now but open to it given the upcoming breaking change).

@tonycoco tonycoco force-pushed the eslint-plus-deps-update branch from 1a7969e to 0c3c171 Compare December 1, 2025 23:54
@tonycoco
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tonycoco commented Dec 1, 2025

The primary issue is with [email protected], which requires Node.js 20 or newer.

@tonycoco
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tonycoco commented Dec 2, 2025

I fixed the tests, but the license check is still failing.

@tonycoco
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tonycoco commented Dec 2, 2025

string-width is MIT
strip-ansi is MIT
wrap-ansi is MIT

@tonycoco tonycoco self-assigned this Dec 2, 2025
@tonycoco tonycoco requested a review from sofisl December 2, 2025 01:50
@tonycoco tonycoco force-pushed the eslint-plus-deps-update branch 2 times, most recently from f2c92c0 to 72ab003 Compare December 3, 2025 19:11
@tonycoco tonycoco force-pushed the eslint-plus-deps-update branch from 72ab003 to 565a78e Compare December 3, 2025 19:11
@sofisl sofisl changed the title eslint: use new config format (plus update deps) feat!: eslint use new config format (plus update deps) Dec 3, 2025
@sofisl
Copy link
Collaborator

sofisl commented Dec 3, 2025

LGTM but want to get @feywind opinion on it

@tonycoco tonycoco merged commit 625836a into main Dec 4, 2025
10 checks passed
@tonycoco tonycoco deleted the eslint-plus-deps-update branch December 4, 2025 18:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants