Skip to content

Make losing client ID optional in bulk transfers#3169

Open
CydeWeys wants to merge 1 commit into
google:masterfrom
CydeWeys:optional-losing-client
Open

Make losing client ID optional in bulk transfers#3169
CydeWeys wants to merge 1 commit into
google:masterfrom
CydeWeys:optional-losing-client

Conversation

@CydeWeys

@CydeWeys CydeWeys commented Jul 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

When executing bulk domain transfers with an explicit list of domain names or a domain names file, enforcing by losing registrar ID is often unnecessary and redundant (b/537294004).

This commit makes --losing_registrar_id an optional command-line parameter and updates BulkDomainTransferAction and BatchModule to handle an optional losing sponsor ID. Existing behavior is preserved when the parameter is explicitly supplied.

BUG= http://b/537294004


This change is Reviewable

Comment thread core/src/main/java/google/registry/tools/BulkDomainTransferCommand.java Outdated
@CydeWeys
CydeWeys force-pushed the optional-losing-client branch from d30aa28 to d3c8449 Compare July 21, 2026 16:31
@CydeWeys
CydeWeys requested a review from jicelhay July 21, 2026 16:31
When executing bulk domain transfers with an explicit list of domain names or
a domain names file, enforcing by losing registrar ID is often unnecessary
and redundant (b/537294004).

This commit makes --losing_registrar_id an optional command-line parameter
and updates BulkDomainTransferAction and BatchModule to handle an optional
losing sponsor ID. Existing behavior is preserved when the parameter is
explicitly supplied.

BUG= http://b/537294004
@CydeWeys
CydeWeys force-pushed the optional-losing-client branch from d3c8449 to 146d562 Compare July 21, 2026 17:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant