Skip to content

feat: transitive extractor for Python requirements #1877

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cuixq
Copy link
Contributor

@cuixq cuixq commented May 22, 2025

This PR enables the transitive extractor for Python requirement files. Considering that there is only the native registry client for PyPI, we use that for requirements.txt transitive extractor.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 22, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 65.34%. Comparing base (70074a7) to head (7bc5d73).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1877      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   65.28%   65.34%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         164      164              
  Lines       15868    15886      +18     
==========================================
+ Hits        10359    10380      +21     
+ Misses       4845     4843       -2     
+ Partials      664      663       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@cuixq cuixq marked this pull request as ready for review May 27, 2025 05:34
@cuixq cuixq requested a review from another-rex May 27, 2025 05:34
@another-rex
Copy link
Collaborator

#1846 Going to wait for this one to get merged in first, then we need to do some work to support having both extractor types similar to what that PR does for the pomxml extractor.

@cuixq
Copy link
Contributor Author

cuixq commented May 27, 2025

@another-rex do you have idea how long this will take roughly?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants