Skip to content

protos: tp: ui: add explicit enum for track_event merging #1630

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

LalitMaganti
Copy link
Collaborator

@LalitMaganti LalitMaganti commented May 22, 2025

This CL adds an explicit proto for deciding how track_event tracks should be merged together in the UI (and eventually the trace processor). Until now we've relied on a very implicit merging scheme but with this change, we can now properly define this and allow users to choose how they want merging to happen.

@LalitMaganti LalitMaganti requested review from a team as code owners May 22, 2025 20:59
@LalitMaganti LalitMaganti requested review from aMayzner, rsavitski, ddiproietto, primiano and etiennep-chromium and removed request for rsavitski and aMayzner May 22, 2025 20:59
@LalitMaganti LalitMaganti changed the title merging protos: tp: ui: add explicit enum for track_event merging May 22, 2025
@LalitMaganti LalitMaganti requested a review from stevegolton May 22, 2025 21:03
@LalitMaganti LalitMaganti requested a review from a team as a code owner May 22, 2025 21:10
// Resulting UI (when merging by SIBLING_MERGE_KEY):
// SystemActivity
// ├── AuthService (merged by smk: "auth_main_cluster")
// │ ├── LoginOp (merged by smk: "login_v1")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  //     │   ├── LoginOp (merged by smk: "login_v1")
  //     │   └── LoginOp (merged by smk: "login_v1")

Copy link
Member

@stevegolton stevegolton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great!

@LalitMaganti LalitMaganti deleted the dev/lalitm/merge branch June 1, 2025 13:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants