Skip to content

Conversation

@amanda-tarafa
Copy link
Contributor

Changes in this PR will be published to Nuget on the next release cycle.

@amanda-tarafa amanda-tarafa requested a review from a team as a code owner October 27, 2025 08:09
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @amanda-tarafa, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request brings a significant update to the Google Cloud API surface, encompassing numerous services with new features, improved clarity in existing definitions, and expanded regional support. The changes aim to provide developers with more robust and well-documented tools for building and managing their cloud applications, from device management and data integration to container orchestration and AI-powered services.

Highlights

  • API Regeneration: Multiple Google Cloud services have undergone API regeneration, updating their definitions and client libraries to reflect the latest specifications.
  • New Service: Chrome Web Store API v2: A new API for the Chrome Web Store (v2) has been introduced, providing functionalities for media uploads and managing publisher items like submissions, status checks, and publishing.
  • New Features in Admin Directory API: The Admin Directory API now includes detailed Bluetooth adapter information for Chrome OS devices, enhancing device management capabilities.
  • Dataplex Integration for AlloyDB: AlloyDB APIs (v1, v1alpha, v1beta) now support Dataplex integration, allowing configuration for managing AlloyDB PG resources within Dataplex.
  • Enhanced Analytics Hub Listings: The Analytics Hub API now allows for tagging Pub/Sub subscriptions and includes configuration for sharing stored procedures on linked datasets.
  • Backup and Recovery Enhancements: The Backup and DR API introduces new methods to fetch backups by resource type and list data source references, along with new fields for GCP resource identification and instance timestamps.
  • Container Orchestration Updates: Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) APIs (v1, v1beta1) now support kernel module loading configurations, swap space management, and refined maintenance exclusion options for node pools.
  • Improved Drive API Comments: The Drive API (v3) now includes assignee email addresses and mentioned email addresses within comment and reply resources, improving collaboration features.
  • Advanced GraphQL Error Handling in Firebase Data Connect: Firebase Data Connect APIs (v1, v1beta) have enhanced GraphQL error reporting, including warning levels and suggested workarounds for compile and execution errors.
  • Comprehensive AI Platform Updates: The Firebase ML API (v2beta) has received extensive updates to its AI Platform-related schemas, clarifying descriptions and adding new fields for content generation, grounding, safety settings, and media handling.
  • Service Identity and Policy Management: Service Consumer Management APIs (v1, v1beta1) now provide project-level IAM roles for service identities and include partial success reporting for operations. Service Usage API (v1) introduces Content Security Policies.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@jskeet jskeet merged commit 5f805dd into main Oct 27, 2025
5 checks passed
@jskeet jskeet deleted the release-2025-10-27.08-02-59 branch October 27, 2025 08:15
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request includes several updates to the Google APIs .NET client libraries, primarily focusing on updating revisions, adding new features, and modifying descriptions across various services like Admin Directory, Analytics Hub, Cloud Build, and more. A new API, Chrome Web Store API v2, has also been added. I have identified a few areas for improvement, mainly concerning descriptions and unsupported fields.

"parameters": {
"extraLocationTypes": {
"description": "Optional. Unless explicitly documented otherwise, don't use this unsupported field which is primarily intended for internal usage.",
"description": "Optional. Do not use this field. It is unsupported and is ignored unless explicitly documented otherwise. This is primarily for internal usage.",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The description should start with a verb and be more concise, focusing on what the field is, rather than instructing users on what not to do. Also, it's better to use a negative imperative rather than a positive one. For example, instead of "Unless explicitly documented otherwise, don't use this unsupported field", try "Do not use this field unless explicitly documented."

description": "Optional. Do not use this field. It is unsupported and is ignored unless explicitly documented otherwise. This is primarily for internal usage."

"parameters": {
"extraLocationTypes": {
"description": "Optional. Unless explicitly documented otherwise, don't use this unsupported field which is primarily intended for internal usage.",
"description": "Optional. Do not use this field. It is unsupported and is ignored unless explicitly documented otherwise. This is primarily for internal usage.",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The description should start with a verb and be more concise, focusing on what the field is, rather than instructing users on what not to do. Also, it's better to use a negative imperative rather than a positive one. For example, instead of "Unless explicitly documented otherwise, don't use this unsupported field", try "Do not use this field unless explicitly documented."

description": "Optional. Do not use this field. It is unsupported and is ignored unless explicitly documented otherwise. This is primarily for internal usage."

"parameters": {
"extraLocationTypes": {
"description": "Optional. Unless explicitly documented otherwise, don't use this unsupported field which is primarily intended for internal usage.",
"description": "Optional. Do not use this field. It is unsupported and is ignored unless explicitly documented otherwise. This is primarily for internal usage.",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The description should start with a verb and be more concise, focusing on what the field is, rather than instructing users on what not to do. Also, it's better to use a negative imperative rather than a positive one. For example, instead of "Unless explicitly documented otherwise, don't use this unsupported field", try "Do not use this field unless explicitly documented."

description": "Optional. Do not use this field. It is unsupported and is ignored unless explicitly documented otherwise. This is primarily for internal usage."

"parameters": {
"extraLocationTypes": {
"description": "Optional. Unless explicitly documented otherwise, don't use this unsupported field which is primarily intended for internal usage.",
"description": "Optional. Do not use this field. It is unsupported and is ignored unless explicitly documented otherwise. This is primarily for internal usage.",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The description should start with a verb and be more concise, focusing on what the field is, rather than instructing users on what not to do. Also, it's better to use a negative imperative rather than a positive one. For example, instead of "Unless explicitly documented otherwise, don't use this unsupported field", try "Do not use this field unless explicitly documented."

description": "Optional. Do not use this field. It is unsupported and is ignored unless explicitly documented otherwise. This is primarily for internal usage."

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants