fix wrapper command

[juls0730]

This PR allegedly fixes the issue described in #401 I say allegedly, because, well, I cant actually test it, because I need an API key, and I like to ship fast since it should be a simple fix, here it is. Let me restate that the fix is UNTESTED and tbf I dont even know if it works properly. if it doesnt and you want me to get back to work, you can issue me an api key at [email protected] or dont 🤷‍♀️

[cla-bot]

We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't have yours on file. In order for us to review and merge your code, please send a signing request to [email protected] and add your github handle to contributors list.

[blarfoon]

Hey! Thanks for your PR.

Sorry for the late response. The test backend doesn't need API keys anymore, so you can just hook that up.

I will try to take a look at this PR this weekend!

[juls0730]

Oh I see, I’ll test this once I get home then an update you/modify my commit. You should also probably update the readme 😅, thanks!

[juls0730]

Hey, @blarfoon, sorry if this is a bother, but I have been unable to test these changes myself as prism cannot be installed on my system for some reason, probably because I am on linux. I have signed the CLA here gorilla-devs/clabot-config#12, and am waiting for it to be merged. if you could take a look at this, that would be great, I will try a little more to get a development environment up and update you if I succeed.

Thanks for all of your work on this project!
Zoe

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
1 out of 2 committers have signed the CLA.

✅ blarfoon
❌ juls0730
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[blarfoon]

Good catch on the issue. I think the proposed solution is too brittle. I would suggest implementing a proper parsing using shlex which is already used elsewhere as well.

Let me know if I can be of any help or if you want me to do it instead.

Davide