Skip to content

Conversation

@ricky-undeadcoders
Copy link
Contributor

@ricky-undeadcoders ricky-undeadcoders commented Dec 8, 2025

Currently in docker-build-push-action we're not assigning a buildx builder when calling docker/build-push-action, so we're using a new builder instead of the one we setup using docker/setup-buildx. This resolves that by passing the builder name that we've created.

  • Docker Buildx setup: Added an id (setup-buildx) to the Buildx setup step, allowing outputs from this step to be referenced in later steps.
  • Docker Buildx usage: Updated the Docker build step to use the Buildx builder instance created earlier by referencing ${{ steps.setup-buildx.outputs.name }}.

@ricky-undeadcoders ricky-undeadcoders requested a review from a team as a code owner December 8, 2025 20:24
@ricky-undeadcoders ricky-undeadcoders added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 9, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 59bb68c Dec 9, 2025
24 checks passed
@ricky-undeadcoders ricky-undeadcoders deleted the rwhitaker/dbpi-pass-builder-name branch December 9, 2025 16:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants