Skip to content

[DOCS] Cloud Data Source support #11050

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

klavavej
Copy link
Contributor

This issueless PR aims to clarify GX Cloud Data Source support as discussed in this slack thread

  • Description of PR changes above includes a link to an existing GitHub issue
  • PR title is prefixed with one of: [BUGFIX], [FEATURE], [DOCS], [MAINTENANCE], [CONTRIB], [MINORBUMP]
  • Code is linted - run invoke lint (uses ruff format + ruff check)
  • Appropriate tests and docs have been updated

For more information about contributing, visit our community resources.

After you submit your PR, keep the page open and monitor the statuses of the various checks made by our continuous integration process at the bottom of the page. Please fix any issues that come up and reach out on Slack if you need help. Thanks for contributing!

Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 27, 2025

Deploy Preview for niobium-lead-7998 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 7edb673
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/niobium-lead-7998/deploys/67e5794252c4b90008df54a9
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-11050.docs.greatexpectations.io
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 27, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.95%. Comparing base (7c343bb) to head (7edb673).

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop   #11050   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    80.95%   80.95%           
========================================
  Files          485      485           
  Lines        41005    41005           
========================================
  Hits         33195    33195           
  Misses        7810     7810           
Flag Coverage Δ
3.10 70.40% <ø> (ø)
3.10 athena or openpyxl or pyarrow or project or sqlite or aws_creds ?
3.10 aws_deps ?
3.10 big ?
3.10 clickhouse ?
3.10 filesystem ?
3.10 mssql ?
3.10 mysql ?
3.10 postgresql ?
3.10 spark_connect ?
3.10 trino ?
3.11 70.40% <ø> (ø)
3.11 athena or openpyxl or pyarrow or project or sqlite or aws_creds ?
3.11 aws_deps ?
3.11 big ?
3.11 clickhouse ?
3.11 filesystem ?
3.11 mssql ?
3.11 mysql ?
3.11 spark_connect ?
3.11 trino ?
3.12 70.40% <ø> (ø)
3.12 athena or openpyxl or pyarrow or project or sqlite or aws_creds 56.82% <ø> (ø)
3.12 aws_deps 46.60% <ø> (ø)
3.12 big 55.02% <ø> (ø)
3.12 bigquery 49.19% <ø> (ø)
3.12 databricks 50.84% <ø> (ø)
3.12 filesystem 63.16% <ø> (ø)
3.12 mssql 51.89% <ø> (ø)
3.12 mysql 52.14% <ø> (ø)
3.12 postgresql 54.81% <ø> (ø)
3.12 snowflake 51.61% <ø> (ø)
3.12 spark 58.09% <ø> (ø)
3.12 spark_connect 46.93% <ø> (ø)
3.12 trino 52.57% <ø> (ø)
3.9 70.42% <ø> (ø)
3.9 athena or openpyxl or pyarrow or project or sqlite or aws_creds 56.82% <ø> (ø)
3.9 aws_deps 46.62% <ø> (ø)
3.9 big 55.04% <ø> (ø)
3.9 bigquery 49.19% <ø> (ø)
3.9 clickhouse 43.53% <ø> (ø)
3.9 databricks 50.84% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
3.9 filesystem 63.16% <ø> (ø)
3.9 mssql 51.87% <ø> (ø)
3.9 mysql 52.13% <ø> (ø)
3.9 postgresql 54.80% <ø> (ø)
3.9 snowflake 51.61% <ø> (ø)
3.9 spark 58.05% <ø> (ø)
3.9 spark_connect 46.94% <ø> (ø)
3.9 trino 52.56% <ø> (ø)
cloud 0.00% <ø> (ø)
docs-basic 54.11% <ø> (ø)
docs-creds-needed 52.99% <ø> (ø)
docs-spark 52.53% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@klavavej klavavej marked this pull request as ready for review March 27, 2025 16:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant