Skip to content

[DOCS] Jira ticket creation#11830

Open
klavavej wants to merge 5 commits into
developfrom
kml/DOC-1285/jira2
Open

[DOCS] Jira ticket creation#11830
klavavej wants to merge 5 commits into
developfrom
kml/DOC-1285/jira2

Conversation

@klavavej
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

resolves https://greatexpectations.atlassian.net/browse/DOC-1285 according to the plan linked in that issue

  • Description of PR changes above includes a link to an existing GitHub issue
  • PR title is prefixed with one of: [BUGFIX], [FEATURE], [DOCS], [MAINTENANCE], [CONTRIB], [MINORBUMP]
  • Code is linted - run invoke lint (uses ruff format + ruff check)
  • Appropriate tests and docs have been updated

For more information about contributing, visit our community resources.

After you submit your PR, keep the page open and monitor the statuses of the various checks made by our continuous integration process at the bottom of the page. Please fix any issues that come up and reach out on Slack if you need help. Thanks for contributing!

@netlify
Copy link
Copy Markdown

netlify Bot commented Apr 20, 2026

Deploy Preview for niobium-lead-7998 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit d53a320
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/niobium-lead-7998/deploys/69e6498c42df91000831dd83
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-11830.docs.greatexpectations.io
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@klavavej klavavej marked this pull request as ready for review April 20, 2026 15:24
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 20, 2026 15:24
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Note

Copilot was unable to run its full agentic suite in this review.

Updates GX Cloud documentation to reflect Jira incident management workflows that support linking Expectation failures to new or existing Jira work items (instead of only existing Jira issues), aligning docs with DOC-1285.

Changes:

  • Replaces “Jira issues” wording with “Jira work items” across cloud overview, integrations, alerts, and incidents docs.
  • Expands incident-creation steps to include creating a new Jira work item from GX Cloud.
  • Updates related diagrams and image alt text to match the new terminology.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 8 out of 9 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
docs/docusaurus/static/img/alerts_incidents_actions.drawio Updates diagram text/geometry to reflect “Jira work item” terminology.
docs/docusaurus/docs/cloud/overview/gx_cloud_overview.md Updates overview copy to “new or existing Jira work items”.
docs/docusaurus/docs/cloud/integrations/integrations_lp.md Updates Jira integration card description to “new or existing Jira work items”.
docs/docusaurus/docs/cloud/integrations/integrate_jira.md Updates Jira integration page copy from “issues” to “work items”.
docs/docusaurus/docs/cloud/expectations/manage_expectations.md Expands “Expectation history” description to include Jira work item link events.
docs/docusaurus/docs/cloud/alerts/responses_overview.md Updates incidents description and image alt text to “Jira work item”.
docs/docusaurus/docs/cloud/alerts/manage_incidents.md Updates incident management terminology and documents new-vs-existing work item creation flows.
docs/docusaurus/docs/cloud/alerts/alerts_lp.md Updates “Manage incidents” card description to “Jira work items”.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread docs/docusaurus/docs/cloud/integrations/integrate_jira.md
Comment thread docs/docusaurus/docs/cloud/alerts/manage_incidents.md
Comment thread docs/docusaurus/docs/cloud/expectations/manage_expectations.md Outdated
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Apr 20, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 63.49%. Comparing base (d195f05) to head (d53a320).
⚠️ Report is 36 commits behind head on develop.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (d195f05) and HEAD (d53a320). Click for more details.

HEAD has 21 uploads less than BASE
Flag BASE (d195f05) HEAD (d53a320)
3.11 1 0
3.10 1 0
3.13 1 0
3.12 1 0
3.13 athena 1 0
3.13 clickhouse 1 0
3.13 aws_deps 1 0
3.13 big 1 0
3.13 mysql 1 0
3.13 openpyxl or pyarrow or project or sqlite or aws_creds 1 0
3.13 spark_connect 1 0
3.13 sql_server 1 0
3.13 filesystem 1 0
3.13 postgresql 1 0
cloud 1 0
3.13 trino 1 0
3.13 spark 1 0
3.13 gx-redshift 1 0
3.13 bigquery 1 0
3.13 databricks 1 0
3.13 snowflake 1 0
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           develop   #11830       +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage    84.67%   63.49%   -21.18%     
============================================
  Files          471      469        -2     
  Lines        39179    39177        -2     
============================================
- Hits         33176    24877     -8299     
- Misses        6003    14300     +8297     
Flag Coverage Δ
3.10 ?
3.11 ?
3.12 ?
3.13 ?
3.13 athena ?
3.13 aws_deps ?
3.13 big ?
3.13 bigquery ?
3.13 clickhouse ?
3.13 databricks ?
3.13 filesystem ?
3.13 gx-redshift ?
3.13 mysql ?
3.13 openpyxl or pyarrow or project or sqlite or aws_creds ?
3.13 postgresql ?
3.13 snowflake ?
3.13 spark ?
3.13 spark_connect ?
3.13 sql_server ?
3.13 trino ?
cloud ?
docs-basic 59.51% <ø> (ø)
docs-creds-needed 58.11% <ø> (ø)
docs-spark 57.56% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 20, 2026 15:41
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 8 out of 9 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.


💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread docs/docusaurus/docs/cloud/alerts/manage_incidents.md
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@annabarr annabarr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm!

5. Select the relevant entry in the **Batches & run history** pane.
6. Find the Expectation failure you want to unlink and click the <img src="/img/jira_logo.png" alt="jira logo" width="20" height="20"/> **Jira** icon.
7. Find the issue you want to unlink and click <img src="/img/unlink_icon.png" alt="unlink icon" width="20" height="20"/> **Unlink issue**.
7. Find the work item you want to unlink and click <img src="/img/unlink_icon.png" alt="unlink icon" width="20" height="20"/> **Unlink work item**.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dctalbot I think the hovers on the link and unlink buttons still say "link issue" and "unlink issue". Can we update?

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Is this PR still relevant? If so, what is blocking it? Is there anything you can do to help move it forward?

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity.

It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions 🙇

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the stale Stale issues and PRs label May 22, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

stale Stale issues and PRs

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants