Skip to content

list and identity implementation: azurerm_hpc_cache_nfs_target#31990

Closed
aayushsingh2502 wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
storagecache_list_identity
Closed

list and identity implementation: azurerm_hpc_cache_nfs_target#31990
aayushsingh2502 wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
storagecache_list_identity

Conversation

@aayushsingh2502
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Community Note

  • Please vote on this PR by adding a 👍 reaction to the original PR to help the community and maintainers prioritize for review
  • Please do not leave comments along the lines of "+1", "me too" or "any updates", they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize for review

Description

Implemented list and identity for azurerm_hpc_cache_nfs_target

teamcity Run link: https://hashicorp.teamcity.com/buildConfiguration/TF_AzureRM_AZURERM_SERVICE_PUBLIC_STORAGECACHE/631927?buildTab=overview

PR Checklist

  • I have followed the guidelines in our Contributing Documentation.
  • I have checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
  • [] I have checked if my changes close any open issues. If so please include appropriate closing keywords below.
  • I have updated/added Documentation as required written in a helpful and kind way to assist users that may be unfamiliar with the resource / data source.
  • I have used a meaningful PR title to help maintainers and other users understand this change and help prevent duplicate work.
    For example: “resource_name_here - description of change e.g. adding property new_property_name_here

Changes to existing Resource / Data Source

  • I have added an explanation of what my changes do and why I'd like you to include them (This may be covered by linking to an issue above, but may benefit from additional explanation).
  • I have written new tests for my resource or datasource changes & updated any relevant documentation.
  • I have successfully run tests with my changes locally. If not, please provide details on testing challenges that prevented you running the tests.
  • (For changes that include a state migration only). I have manually tested the migration path between relevant versions of the provider.

Testing

  • My submission includes Test coverage as described in the Contribution Guide and the tests pass. (if this is not possible for any reason, please include details of why you did or could not add test coverage)

Change Log

Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.

  • azurerm_resource - support for the thing1 property [GH-00000]

This is a (please select all that apply):

  • Bug Fix
  • New Feature (ie adding a service, resource, or data source)
  • Enhancement
  • Breaking Change

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #0000

AI Assistance Disclosure

  • AI Assisted - This contribution was made by, or with the assistance of, AI/LLMs

Rollback Plan

If a change needs to be reverted, we will publish an updated version of the provider.

Changes to Security Controls

Are there any changes to security controls (access controls, encryption, logging) in this pull request? If so, explain.

Note

If this PR changes meaningfully during the course of review please update the title and description as required.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Build failure

This pull request contains a build failure which needs addressed here .

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Build failure

This pull request contains a build failure which needs addressed here .

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@mbfrahry mbfrahry left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @aayushsingh2502, it looks like this service might be retired? Can you confirm?

"github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/internal/timeouts"
)

//go:generate go run ../../tools/generator-tests resourceidentity -resource-name hpc_cache_nfs_target -service-package-name storagecache -properties "name,resource_group_name,cache_name" -known-values "subscription_id:data.Subscriptions.Primary" -test-sequential
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This can be removed

Suggested change
//go:generate go run ../../tools/generator-tests resourceidentity -resource-name hpc_cache_nfs_target -service-package-name storagecache -properties "name,resource_group_name,cache_name" -known-values "subscription_id:data.Subscriptions.Primary" -test-sequential
//go:generate go run ../../tools/generator-tests resourceidentity -resource-name hpc_cache_nfs_target -service-package-name storagecache -properties "name,resource_group_name,cache_name" -test-sequential

Comment on lines +25 to +27
HPCCacheNFSTargetListModel struct {
CacheId types.String `tfsdk:"cache_id"`
}
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For consistency, please pull this into it's own type struct

}

func (r HPCCacheNFSTargetListResource) Metadata(_ context.Context, _ resource.MetadataRequest, response *resource.MetadataResponse) {
response.TypeName = "azurerm_hpc_cache_nfs_target"
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"azurerm_hpc_cache_nfs_target" should be a const variable since we use it in multiple places.

Suggested change
response.TypeName = "azurerm_hpc_cache_nfs_target"
response.TypeName = azureHPCCacheNFSTargetResourceName

}

func TestAccHPCCacheNFSTarget_usageModel(t *testing.T) {
t.Skip("The HPC Cache service is being retired, these test are no longer functional. Skipping...")
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this service retired?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes

@aayushsingh2502
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

closing the PR as the resource is retired

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants