Update Rust crate bumpalo to v3.19.0

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
bumpalo	workspace.dependencies	minor	=3.17.0 -> =3.19.0

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

fitzgen/bumpalo (bumpalo)

v3.19.0

Released 2025-06-24.

Added

• Added bumpalo::collections::Vec::retain_mut, similar to
  std::vec::Vec::retain_mut.

---

v3.18.1

Compare Source

Released 2025-06-05.

Removed

• Removed the allocator-api2 version bump from 3.18.0, as it was not actually
  semver compatible.

---

v3.18.0

Compare Source

Released 2025-06-05.

Added

• Added support for enforcing a minimum alignment on all allocations inside a
  Bump arena, which can provide speed ups when allocating objects whose
  alignment is less than or equal to that minimum.
• Added serde serialization support for bumpalo::collections::String.
• Added some missing fallible slice allocation function variants.

Changed

• Replaced extend_from_slice implementation with a formally-verified version
  that is also faster and more-optimizable for LLVM.
• Updated allocator-api2 support to version 0.3.*.

Fixed

• Fixed a bug where the allocated_bytes metrics helper was accidentally
  including the size of bumpalo's footer, rather than just reporting the
  user-allocated bytes.

---

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 54.65%. Comparing base (cc77c99) to head (ce5aa13).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #7370   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   54.65%   54.65%           
=======================================
  Files        1093     1093           
  Lines       96982    96982           
  Branches     4540     4540           
=======================================
+ Hits        53005    53006    +1     
+ Misses      43389    43388    -1     
  Partials      588      588           

Flag	Coverage Δ
blockprotocol.type-system	35.85% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	50.93% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	88.77% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.22% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.11% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	71.25% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.58% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	19.87% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	30.93% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	48.22% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.29% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	74.36% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif	97.93% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[hash-worker]

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

• any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
• the branch becomes conflicted, or
• you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
• you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: Cargo.lock

Command failed: cargo update --config net.git-fetch-with-cli=true --manifest-path Cargo.toml --package [email protected] --precise 3.19.0
    Updating crates.io index
error: failed to select a version for the requirement `bumpalo = "=3.17.0"`
candidate versions found which didn't match: 3.19.0
location searched: crates.io index
required by package `oxc_allocator v0.67.0 (https://github.com/TimDiekmann/oxc?rev=333f583e#333f583e)`
    ... which satisfies git dependency `oxc_allocator` (locked to 0.67.0) of package `oxc v0.67.0 (https://github.com/TimDiekmann/oxc?rev=333f583e#333f583e)`
    ... which satisfies dependency `oxc = "=0.67.0"` (locked to 0.67.0) of package `hash-codegen v0.0.0 (/tmp/renovate/repos/github/hashintel/hash/libs/@local/codegen)`
    ... which satisfies path dependency `hash-codegen` (locked to 0.0.0) of package `hash-codec v0.0.0 (/tmp/renovate/repos/github/hashintel/hash/libs/@local/codec)`
    ... which satisfies path dependency `hash-codec` (locked to 0.0.0) of package `hash-graph v0.0.0 (/tmp/renovate/repos/github/hashintel/hash/apps/hash-graph)`

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_extra_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 10002	$$96.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 722 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.318 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$5.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 5001	$$75.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 423 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.164 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 27604	$$284 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.11 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.159 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$20.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 179 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.84 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 13450	$$228 \mathrm{ms} \pm 869 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.162 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 11308	$$164 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.294 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$6.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 5628	$$86.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 506 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.679 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$28.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 173 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.174 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.731 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 91.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.280 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$38.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 407 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$13.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.511 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$24.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 172 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$48.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 256 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.91 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$20.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 873 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}45.6 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.573 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.900 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 42.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.797 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.669 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.313 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.44 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.69 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.07 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.21 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.1 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}12.6 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}11.5 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}13.0 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$85.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.96 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.993 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$83.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.56 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-14.623 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.60 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}2.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$91.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.68 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}12.0 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$95.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.09 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}4.86 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$88.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.85 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.323 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$91.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.43 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}7.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$90.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.47 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}10.5 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$98.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.26 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}3.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$9.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 47.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$216 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.11 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.902 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$228 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.11 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}2.64 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$238 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.37 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}2.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$242 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.26 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.465 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$249 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.31 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.306 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$272 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.20 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.157 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$200 \mathrm{ms} \pm 952 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.287 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$377 \mathrm{ms} \pm 983 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.372 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$391 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.06 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.070 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$399 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.20 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.026 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$408 \mathrm{ms} \pm 916 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.154 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$430 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.28 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.064 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$205 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.66 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-19.521 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$286 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.62 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}5.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$423 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.55 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-2.834 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$267 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.25 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-2.391 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$854 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}3.94 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$98.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 554 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-11.075 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$75.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.06 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.900 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$87.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.51 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}27.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$66.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.44 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-19.173 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$96.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.15 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}20.1 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$120 \mathrm{ms} \pm 647 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}235 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$87.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.89 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}26.6 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$77.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.25 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}17.7 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$84.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.44 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.216 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$86.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.69 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}12.1 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph