ES-17: Remove deprecated features

[TimDiekmann]

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

With the release of [email protected] we can remove the deprecated features. This will take effect from 0.7.0 onwards.

Note: We should wait to merge until we do other breaking changes. This gives us the option to still release 0.6.1 if we want/need to.

🚫 Blocked by

• ES-16: Publish error-stack 0.6.0 #7762

🔍 What does this change?

Remove

• Context
• attach_printable, attach_printable_lazy, attach_lazy
• report!

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

• modifies a Cargo-publishable library, but it is not yet ready to publish

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

• are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

• do not affect the execution graph

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 54.90%. Comparing base (25b8d30) to head (7ded865).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7763      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   54.85%   54.90%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files        1083     1084       +1     
  Lines       96635    96588      -47     
  Branches     4537     4538       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits        53010    53031      +21     
+ Misses      43035    42968      -67     
+ Partials      590      589       -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.22% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.52% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	3.13% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	20.06% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	32.93% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	48.22% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.29% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	51.38% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	50.24% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	85.96% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[TimDiekmann]

Put on hold until we do other breaking changes. The issue about the unstable feature emitting a different output should be revisited when we come back to this.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_extra_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 10002	$$96.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 596 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.055 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$5.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 5001	$$77.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 426 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.035 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 27604	$$283 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.11 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.945 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$21.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 207 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.408 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 13450	$$227 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.02 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.855 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 11308	$$136 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.62 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$6.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 5628	$$87.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 565 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.084 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$28.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 173 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.161 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$13.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.228 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$37.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 319 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.882 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.99 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$23.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 143 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.225 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$47.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 173 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.908 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 126 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-42.812 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.699 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.348 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.69 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.714 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.585 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-34.282 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.90 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-34.409 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-34.371 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-43.914 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-44.952 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-43.562 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.83 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.64 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.89 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.86 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.44 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$29.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 268 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.431 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$30.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 327 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.577 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$29.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 257 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.243 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 248 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$30.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 239 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$30.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 283 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$30.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 260 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$29.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 249 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.178 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$30.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 279 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$9.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.156 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$55.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 239 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.482 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$63.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 328 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.137 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$72.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 238 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.871 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$83.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 789 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.056 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$88.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 349 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.172 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 419 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.618 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$48.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 182 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.926 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$93.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 448 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.093 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 519 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.869 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$116 \mathrm{ms} \pm 529 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.385 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$122 \mathrm{ms} \pm 489 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.093 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$140 \mathrm{ms} \pm 475 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.421 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$58.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 270 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.584 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 534 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$245 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.36 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.274 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$70.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 619 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$360 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.16 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.605 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 117 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$17.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.71 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$17.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 108 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.733 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$15.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 92.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 52.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$26.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 130 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph