Update GitHub Action `codecov/codecov-action` to v5.5.1 #7859

hash-worker · 2025-10-09T18:52:57Z

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
codecov/codecov-action	action	minor	`v5.4.3` -> `v5.5.1`

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

Release Notes

codecov/codecov-action (codecov/codecov-action)

`v5.5.1`

Compare Source

What's Changed

fix: overwrite pr number on fork by @thomasrockhu-codecov in #1871
build(deps): bump actions/checkout from 4.2.2 to 5.0.0 by @app/dependabot in #1868
build(deps): bump github/codeql-action from 3.29.9 to 3.29.11 by @app/dependabot in #1867
fix: update to use local app/ dir by @thomasrockhu-codecov in #1872
docs: fix typo in README by @datalater in #1866
Document a codecov-cli version reference example by @webknjaz in #1774
build(deps): bump github/codeql-action from 3.28.18 to 3.29.9 by @app/dependabot in #1861
build(deps): bump ossf/scorecard-action from 2.4.1 to 2.4.2 by @app/dependabot in #1833

Full Changelog: https://github.com/codecov/codecov-action/compare/v5.5.0..v5.5.1

`v5.5.0`

Compare Source

What's Changed

feat: upgrade wrapper to 0.2.4 by @jviall in #1864
Pin actions/github-script by Git SHA by @martincostello in #1859
fix: check reqs exist by @joseph-sentry in #1835
fix: Typo in README by @spalmurray in #1838
docs: Refine OIDC docs by @spalmurray in #1837
build(deps): bump github/codeql-action from 3.28.17 to 3.28.18 by @app/dependabot in #1829

Full Changelog: https://github.com/codecov/codecov-action/compare/v5.4.3..v5.5.0

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 2am on saturday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

codecov · 2025-10-09T19:00:42Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 55.08%. Comparing base (7a8bc80) to head (cbdd056).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7859      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   55.15%   55.08%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files        1103     1103              
  Lines       98577    98702     +125     
  Branches     4577     4583       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits        54368    54374       +6     
- Misses      43589    43708     +119     
  Partials      620      620

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.32% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
blockprotocol.type-system	`35.85% <ø> (ø)`
local.harpc-client	`51.24% <ø> (-0.65%)`	⬇️
local.hash-backend-utils	`4.06% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`10.88% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.antsi	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.error-stack	`88.77% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-codec	`84.22% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-net	`96.08% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-tower	`66.80% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	`92.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-codec	`71.25% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`2.85% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-authorization	`62.58% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	`19.65% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-store	`30.93% <ø> (-0.73%)`	⬇️
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	`48.22% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-validation	`83.29% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-ast	`87.17% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-compiletest	`53.03% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-core	`81.93% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-diagnostics	`72.38% <ø> (-0.26%)`	⬇️
rust.hashql-eval	`68.10% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-hir	`89.22% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	`93.94% <ø> (ø)`
rust.sarif	`97.93% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

github-actions · 2025-10-15T18:31:17Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_extra_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 10002	$$100 \mathrm{ms} \pm 710 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-19.074 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$5.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.174 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 5001	$$77.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 517 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.682 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 27604	$$292 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.51 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.295 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$21.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 211 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 13450	$$230 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.16 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.322 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 11308	$$460 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.43 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}256 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$6.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 50.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-85.278 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 5628	$$87.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.13 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}6.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$29.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 172 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.899 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$13.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.866 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$39.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 315 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.002 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 91.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.912 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$24.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 140 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.224 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$29.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 150 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-38.905 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$12.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-58.393 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.295 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.423 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 35.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.086 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.727 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.065 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 33.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.313 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.186 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.836 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.84 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.78 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.83 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$30.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 300 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.379 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$30.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 285 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.706 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$31.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 340 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.216 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$30.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 293 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.937 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$31.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 324 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.361 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$30.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 288 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.267 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$30.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 277 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.439 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$31.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 311 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.448 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$31.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 284 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.910 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$9.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.414 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$57.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 269 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.644 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 448 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.694 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$62.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 339 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.045 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$71.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 361 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.116 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$81.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 369 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.050 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$88.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 425 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.720 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$51.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 264 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.178 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$80.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 355 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.269 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$56.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 257 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.032 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$65.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 345 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.395 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$68.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 341 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.510 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$67.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 296 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.346 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$50.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 298 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$59.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 579 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.152 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$54.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 274 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.726 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$53.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 305 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.916 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$75.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 541 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.842 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$50.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 329 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.64 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$62.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 465 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$55.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 504 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.376 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$53.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 355 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.096 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$76.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 330 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.88 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 83.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$23.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 167 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$148 \mathrm{ms} \pm 529 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$142 \mathrm{ms} \pm 572 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$44.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 220 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-57.763 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$561 \mathrm{ms} \pm 954 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.726 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

hash-worker bot enabled auto-merge October 9, 2025 18:52

github-actions bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area) labels Oct 9, 2025

vercel bot deployed to Preview October 9, 2025 19:13 View deployment

hash-worker bot assigned TimDiekmann Oct 9, 2025

Update GitHub Action codecov/codecov-action to v5.5.1

cbdd056

hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/gha/codecov-codecov-action-5.x branch from 1708fea to cbdd056 Compare October 15, 2025 16:47

vercel bot deployed to Preview October 15, 2025 16:59 View deployment

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

Update GitHub Action `codecov/codecov-action` to v5.5.1 #7859

Update GitHub Action `codecov/codecov-action` to v5.5.1 #7859

Uh oh!

hash-worker bot commented Oct 9, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Oct 9, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Oct 15, 2025

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_extra_large

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

scaling_read_entity_linkless

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

Update GitHub Action codecov/codecov-action to v5.5.1 #7859

Are you sure you want to change the base?

Update GitHub Action codecov/codecov-action to v5.5.1 #7859

Uh oh!

Conversation

hash-worker bot commented Oct 9, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Release Notes

v5.5.1

What's Changed

v5.5.0

What's Changed

Configuration

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Oct 9, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Oct 15, 2025

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_extra_large

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

scaling_read_entity_linkless

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

Update GitHub Action `codecov/codecov-action` to v5.5.1 #7859

Update GitHub Action `codecov/codecov-action` to v5.5.1 #7859

hash-worker bot commented Oct 9, 2025 •

edited

Loading

`v5.5.1`

`v5.5.0`

codecov bot commented Oct 9, 2025 •

edited

Loading