Update `postgres` Rust crates #8263

hash-worker · 2026-01-16T00:37:07Z

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
postgres-protocol	workspace.dependencies	patch	`0.6.9` -> `0.6.10`
postgres-types	workspace.dependencies	patch	`0.2.11` -> `0.2.12`
tokio-postgres	workspace.dependencies	patch	`0.7.15` -> `0.7.16`

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

Release Notes

rust-postgres/rust-postgres (postgres-protocol)

`v0.6.10`: postgres-protocol v0.6.10

Compare Source

Added

Implemented FallibleIterator::size_hint for Fields.

Fixed

Increased bind parameter limit from i16::MAX to u16::MAX.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

cursor · 2026-01-16T00:37:12Z

PR Summary

Postgres crate updates

Bump postgres-protocol → 0.6.10, postgres-types → 0.2.12, tokio-postgres → 0.7.16

Lockfile refresh / transitive changes

Normalize windows-sys versions across deps and adjust winapi-util, term, nu-ansi-term
Add new wasi 0.14.4+wasi-0.2.4 and pin wit-bindgen versions; update wasite and wasip2
Minor transitive bumps/cleanups: libredox 0.1.12, whoami 2.0.2, remove duplicate redox_syscall 0.6.0 entry

Changes are confined to Cargo.lock; no source code modifications.

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 7f15cff. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

augmentcode · 2026-01-16T00:37:50Z

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: This PR updates the Rust Postgres dependency set via a lockfile refresh.

Changes:

Bumps postgres-protocol from 0.6.9 to 0.6.10
Bumps postgres-types from 0.2.11 to 0.2.12
Bumps tokio-postgres from 0.7.15 to 0.7.16

Technical Notes: The only change shown in the diff is Cargo.lock, so behavior should be unchanged aside from upstream bugfixes (e.g., higher bind parameter limit in postgres-protocol).

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

augmentcode

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

vercel · 2026-01-16T00:40:40Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Review	Updated (UTC)
ds-theme	Error		Jan 16, 2026 0:40am
hashdotdesign	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jan 16, 2026 0:40am

codecov · 2026-01-16T00:41:15Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.27%. Comparing base (86f263f) to head (7f15cff).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8263   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   59.26%   59.27%           
=======================================
  Files        1191     1191           
  Lines      113436   113494   +58     
  Branches     4982     4986    +4     
=======================================
+ Hits        67232    67272   +40     
- Misses      45428    45446   +18     
  Partials      776      776

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.40% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
blockprotocol.type-system	`40.84% <ø> (ø)`
local.claude-hooks	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.harpc-client	`51.24% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`10.88% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.antsi	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.error-stack	`90.88% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-codec	`84.70% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-net	`96.16% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-tower	`66.80% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	`92.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-codec	`72.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`2.89% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-authorization	`62.47% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	`25.61% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-store	`30.54% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	`47.95% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-validation	`83.45% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-ast	`87.25% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-compiletest	`46.65% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-core	`82.30% <ø> (-0.03%)`	⬇️
rust.hashql-diagnostics	`72.43% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-eval	`68.54% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-hir	`89.10% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-mir	`88.23% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	`94.05% <ø> (-0.01%)`	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codspeed-hq · 2026-01-16T00:41:32Z

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 14 untouched benchmarks
🗄️ 3 archived benchmarks run¹

_{Comparing deps/rs/postgres-rust-crates (7f15cff) with main (abd5ba1)}

3 benchmarks were run, but are now archived. If they were deleted in another branch, consider rebasing to remove them from the report. Instead if they were added back, click here to restore them. ↩

github-actions · 2026-01-16T01:46:17Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$25.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 164 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-17.298 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$41.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 286 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$13.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.78 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$22.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 146 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.896 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$26.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 173 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-38.339 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-81.763 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-63.396 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.554 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.98 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$4.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.048 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.84 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.182 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.2 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.85 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.64 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.89 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$38.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 184 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.376 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$74.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 341 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.007 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$42.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 163 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.415 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$45.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 252 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$52.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 338 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$39.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 148 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.372 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$413 \mathrm{ms} \pm 803 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.628 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$92.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 520 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$83.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 333 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.285 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$276 \mathrm{ms} \pm 741 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.811 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.559 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 52.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.958 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$17.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 56.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$21.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.84 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$29.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 280 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.181 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$28.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 258 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.889 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$28.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 302 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.631 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$28.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 226 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.871 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$28.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 284 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.767 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$29.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 267 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$30.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 308 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.44 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$28.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 296 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.120 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$28.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 216 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.78 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 52.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$45.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 224 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.634 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$91.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 391 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.518 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$50.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 239 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.452 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$58.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 249 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.028 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$67.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 486 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.284 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$73.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 439 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$48.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 217 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.703 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$75.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 317 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$55.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 366 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.375 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$62.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 316 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.172 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$64.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 350 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.662 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$65.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 396 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$137 \mathrm{ms} \pm 478 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.86 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$135 \mathrm{ms} \pm 477 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$39.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 180 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-61.724 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$565 \mathrm{ms} \pm 873 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.971 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

Update postgres Rust crates

7f15cff

hash-worker bot enabled auto-merge January 16, 2026 00:37

github-actions bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label Jan 16, 2026

augmentcode bot reviewed Jan 16, 2026

View reviewed changes

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign January 16, 2026 00:40 View deployment

vercel bot had a problem deploying to Preview – ds-theme January 16, 2026 00:40 Failure

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut January 16, 2026 00:42 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash January 16, 2026 00:48 View deployment

hash-worker bot assigned indietyp and TimDiekmann Jan 16, 2026

hash-worker bot requested a review from a team January 16, 2026 01:01

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

Update `postgres` Rust crates #8263

Update `postgres` Rust crates #8263

hash-worker bot commented Jan 16, 2026

Uh oh!

cursor bot commented Jan 16, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot commented Jan 16, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot left a comment

Uh oh!

vercel bot commented Jan 16, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Jan 16, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq bot commented Jan 16, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jan 16, 2026

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

Update postgres Rust crates #8263

Are you sure you want to change the base?

Update postgres Rust crates #8263

Conversation

hash-worker bot commented Jan 16, 2026

Release Notes

v0.6.10: postgres-protocol v0.6.10

Added

Fixed

Configuration

Uh oh!

cursor bot commented Jan 16, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot commented Jan 16, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

vercel bot commented Jan 16, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Jan 16, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq bot commented Jan 16, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Footnotes

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jan 16, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

Update `postgres` Rust crates #8263

Update `postgres` Rust crates #8263

`v0.6.10`: postgres-protocol v0.6.10

cursor bot commented Jan 16, 2026 •

edited

Loading

vercel bot commented Jan 16, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Jan 16, 2026 •

edited

Loading