Update Rust crate `nextest-metadata` to 0.14.0 by hash-worker[bot] · Pull Request #8315 · hashintel/hash

hash-worker · 2026-01-24T07:42:24Z

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
nextest-metadata	workspace.dependencies	minor	`0.12.2` -> `0.14.0`

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

Release Notes

nextest-rs/nextest (nextest-metadata)

`v0.14.0`: nextest-metadata 0.14.0

Compare Source

Added

A new build_directory field on RustBuildMetaSummary. When Cargo's build.build-dir is configured, the build directory (for intermediate artifacts) differs from the target directory. This is None when parsing metadata from older nextest versions, in which case consumers should treat it as equal to target_directory.
A new build_script_info field on RustBuildMetaSummary, keyed by package ID. This is None when parsing metadata from older nextest versions.
- The values of this map are BuildScriptInfoSummary structs, which currently contain an envs field consisting of environment variables set by cargo::rustc-env directives.

Changed

base_output_directories, build_script_out_dirs, and linked_paths are now documented as relative to the build directory rather than the target directory.

`v0.13.3`: nextest-metadata 0.13.3

Compare Source

Added

MismatchReason::ALL_VARIANTS iterates over all known variants of MismatchReason.

`v0.13.2`: nextest-metadata 0.13.2

Compare Source

Added

NextestExitCode::RERUN_TESTS_OUTSTANDING indicates that all tests passed during a rerun, but there are still outstanding tests that were known to have failed earlier.
For test filtering, MismatchReason::RerunAlreadyPassed, indicating that the test run already passed.
With the proptest1 feature, impl Arbitrary for TestCaseName.

`v0.13.1`: nextest-metadata 0.13.1

Compare Source

Added

New proptest1 feature enables proptest Arbitrary implementations for RustBinaryId and MismatchReason.

`v0.13.0`: nextest-metadata 0.13.0

Compare Source

Changed

A new TestCaseName newtype wraps test case identifiers, providing type safety and utility methods:
- components() splits the name on :: to yield module path components.
- module_path_and_name() extracts the module path prefix and trailing name.
RustTestCaseSummary now includes a kind field of type Option<RustTestKind>, distinguishing between tests (#[test]) and benchmarks (#[bench]). This field is None when parsing output from older nextest versions.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

cursor · 2026-01-24T07:42:30Z

PR Summary

Low Risk
Low risk dependency-only change; primary risk is minor build/test breakage if downstream code relies on nextest-metadata APIs or serialized formats.

Overview
Updates the workspace Rust dependency nextest-metadata from 0.12.2 to 0.14.0 in Cargo.toml.

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 3572bce. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

augmentcode · 2026-01-24T07:44:11Z

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the workspace Rust dependency nextest-metadata from 0.12.2 to 0.13.0.
Why: Keeps the repo aligned with newer nextest metadata APIs/schema changes introduced in the 0.13.x line.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

augmentcode

Review completed. 1 suggestions posted.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

augmentcode · 2026-01-24T07:44:12Z

Cargo.toml

 nextest-filtering                  = { version = "0.17.0", default-features = false }
-nextest-metadata                   = { version = "0.12.2", default-features = false }
+nextest-metadata                   = { version = "0.13.0", default-features = false }
 nodejs_package_json                = { version = "0.4.4" }


This bump likely needs a corresponding Cargo.lock update (CI runs cargo update --workspace --locked and will fail if the lockfile isn't already consistent with the new nextest-metadata requirement).

_{🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

codspeed-hq · 2026-01-24T07:46:26Z

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 56 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 24 skipped benchmarks¹

_{Comparing deps/rs/nextest-metadata-0.x (3572bce) with main (c89da2a)}

24 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

codecov · 2026-01-24T07:47:10Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.50%. Comparing base (637b75b) to head (3572bce).
⚠️ Report is 19 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8315      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.65%   62.50%   -0.15%     
==========================================
  Files        1314     1318       +4     
  Lines      133870   134185     +315     
  Branches     5517     5517              
==========================================
  Hits        83877    83877              
- Misses      49078    49393     +315     
  Partials      915      915

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.40% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
blockprotocol.type-system	`40.84% <ø> (ø)`
local.claude-hooks	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.harpc-client	`51.24% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`9.63% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.antsi	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.error-stack	`90.88% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-codec	`84.70% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-net	`96.16% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-tower	`66.80% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	`92.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-codec	`72.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`2.53% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
rust.hash-graph-authorization	`62.34% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	`26.39% <ø> (-0.27%)`	⬇️
rust.hash-graph-store	`37.76% <ø> (-0.13%)`	⬇️
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	`47.95% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-validation	`83.45% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-core	`82.29% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-diagnostics	`72.43% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	`94.05% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

hash-worker · 2026-01-25T23:15:52Z

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
the branch becomes conflicted, or
you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: Cargo.lock

Command failed: cargo update --config net.git-fetch-with-cli=true --manifest-path Cargo.toml --package nextest-metadata@0.12.3 --precise 0.14.0
    Updating crates.io index
error: failed to select a version for the requirement `nextest-metadata = "^0.12.3"`
candidate versions found which didn't match: 0.14.0
location searched: crates.io index
required by package `nextest-filtering v0.17.0`
    ... which satisfies dependency `nextest-filtering = "^0.17.0"` of package `hashql-compiletest v0.0.0 (/tmp/renovate/repos/github/hashintel/hash/libs/@local/hashql/compiletest)`
    ... which satisfies path dependency `hashql-compiletest` (locked to 0.0.0) of package `hashql-ast v0.0.0 (/tmp/renovate/repos/github/hashintel/hash/libs/@local/hashql/ast)`
    ... which satisfies path dependency `hashql-ast` (locked to 0.0.0) of package `hash-graph-api v0.0.0 (/tmp/renovate/repos/github/hashintel/hash/libs/@local/graph/api)`
    ... which satisfies path dependency `hash-graph-api` (locked to 0.0.0) of package `hash-graph v0.0.0 (/tmp/renovate/repos/github/hashintel/hash/apps/hash-graph)`

vercel · 2026-01-25T23:15:58Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 17, 2026 2:01am
hashdotdesign	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 17, 2026 2:01am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Mar 17, 2026 2:01am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Mar 17, 2026 2:01am

github-actions · 2026-03-17T03:08:48Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$29.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 264 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.480 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 39.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 124 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$47.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 406 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 138 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$26.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 194 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$30.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 212 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.046 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$4.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 44.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 123 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$4.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 35.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 38.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 49.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 42.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.99 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$5.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 47.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 39.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 40.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$3.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$3.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 36.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.91 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 36.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.91 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.45 \mathrm{ms} \pm 33.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.89 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 33.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.94 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$49.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 372 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$88.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 626 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$55.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 420 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$57.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 454 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$68.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 485 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.82 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$51.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 408 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$429 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.16 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}2.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$108 \mathrm{ms} \pm 605 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$96.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 517 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$309 \mathrm{ms} \pm 946 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$21.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 174 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$21.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 142 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$22.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 181 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$22.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 147 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$25.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 211 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.186 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$21.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 158 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$21.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 167 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$21.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 165 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$22.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$29.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 286 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$37.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 351 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$37.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 402 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$37.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 393 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$36.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 382 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$39.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 356 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$37.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 369 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.757 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$37.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 373 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.86 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$38.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 390 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$38.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 334 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$9.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 76.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 870 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$160 \mathrm{ms} \pm 971 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 793 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 978 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.86 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$130 \mathrm{ms} \pm 859 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$138 \mathrm{ms} \pm 859 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$109 \mathrm{ms} \pm 621 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$141 \mathrm{ms} \pm 789 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$119 \mathrm{ms} \pm 638 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$128 \mathrm{ms} \pm 744 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$129 \mathrm{ms} \pm 729 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.640 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$130 \mathrm{ms} \pm 817 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$134 \mathrm{ms} \pm 525 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.419 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$147 \mathrm{ms} \pm 706 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.972 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$108 \mathrm{ms} \pm 645 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}33.9 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$574 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.44 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}4.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

hash-worker bot enabled auto-merge January 24, 2026 07:42

hash-worker bot assigned indietyp and TimDiekmann Jan 24, 2026

hash-worker bot requested a review from a team January 24, 2026 07:42

github-actions bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label Jan 24, 2026

augmentcode bot reviewed Jan 24, 2026

View reviewed changes

hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/rs/nextest-metadata-0.x branch from 2892271 to 1969a53 Compare January 25, 2026 23:15

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens January 25, 2026 23:18 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign January 25, 2026 23:19 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut January 25, 2026 23:20 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash January 25, 2026 23:29 View deployment

Update Rust crate nextest-metadata to 0.14.0

3572bce

hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/rs/nextest-metadata-0.x branch from 1969a53 to 3572bce Compare March 17, 2026 01:48

hash-worker bot changed the title ~~Update Rust crate nextest-metadata to 0.13.0~~ Update Rust crate nextest-metadata to 0.14.0 Mar 17, 2026

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens March 17, 2026 01:50 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign March 17, 2026 01:51 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut March 17, 2026 01:51 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash March 17, 2026 02:01 View deployment

Conversation

hash-worker bot commented Jan 24, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Release Notes

v0.14.0: nextest-metadata 0.14.0

Added

Changed

v0.13.3: nextest-metadata 0.13.3

Added

v0.13.2: nextest-metadata 0.13.2

Added

v0.13.1: nextest-metadata 0.13.1

Added

v0.13.0: nextest-metadata 0.13.0

Changed

Configuration

Uh oh!

cursor bot commented Jan 24, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot commented Jan 24, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot Jan 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq bot commented Jan 24, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Footnotes

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Jan 24, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

hash-worker bot commented Jan 25, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

⚠️ Artifact update problem

File name: Cargo.lock

Uh oh!

vercel bot commented Jan 25, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Mar 17, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

hash-worker bot commented Jan 24, 2026 •

edited

Loading

`v0.14.0`: nextest-metadata 0.14.0

`v0.13.3`: nextest-metadata 0.13.3

`v0.13.2`: nextest-metadata 0.13.2

`v0.13.1`: nextest-metadata 0.13.1

`v0.13.0`: nextest-metadata 0.13.0

cursor bot commented Jan 24, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codspeed-hq bot commented Jan 24, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Jan 24, 2026 •

edited

Loading

hash-worker bot commented Jan 25, 2026 •

edited

Loading

vercel bot commented Jan 25, 2026 •

edited

Loading