Skip to content

MC-3230: Fix prometheus mapping names, wrap metrics tables to collapsible elements #484

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 9, 2025

Conversation

anatoly-hazelcast
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@anatoly-hazelcast anatoly-hazelcast requested a review from a team as a code owner April 3, 2025 11:19
Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 3, 2025

Deploy Preview for frosty-curran-1fc0c4 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 502127b
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/frosty-curran-1fc0c4/deploys/67f4d5e0ce4231000857e754
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-484--frosty-curran-1fc0c4.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@Rob-Hazelcast Rob-Hazelcast self-assigned this Apr 7, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@Rob-Hazelcast Rob-Hazelcast left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this. Please apply the suggested changes, unless there are any problems. Does this need backporting or is this for the next release?

@anatoly-hazelcast
Copy link
Contributor Author

anatoly-hazelcast commented Apr 8, 2025

@Rob-Hazelcast thanks for the vigilant review and the suggested changes!! It should require backporting to 5.7 but neither I haven't yet merged the backport to the appropriate management-center branch nor there's an exact plan on when to release it. Hence, I'm not sure how to perform the backporting in the docs. Should I create a separate PR to 5.7 and merge it upon the 5.7.2 release?

@Rob-Hazelcast
Copy link
Contributor

@Rob-Hazelcast thanks for the vigilant review and the suggested changes!! It should require backporting to 5.7 but neither I haven't yet merged the backport to the appropriate management-center branch nor there's an exact plan on when to release it. Hence, I'm not sure how to perform the backporting in the docs. Should I create a separate PR to 5.7 and merge it upon the 5.7.2 release?

No problem. We don't have a set process - typically, new work goes into a new release branch cut from main on release day and isn't back-ported to existing branches. You could merge this to main now and create another PR to cherry pick it to 5.7 when 5.7.2 is released. Or you could add a "backport to 5.7" label to this PR and merge it (and the backport PR it'll create) on the day of the release. Maybe set this to draft so it doesn't get merged accidentally in the meantime.

@anatoly-hazelcast
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Rob-Hazelcast sounds good, I'll add the label then, thanks for suggesting the proper way!

@anatoly-hazelcast
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Rob-Hazelcast I wonder whether I can merge this one now? I'm planning to add more metric mappings (which won't be backported to 5.7.2) and I thought of doing separates PRs for them, as long as I'll be probably adding them in batches.

@Rob-Hazelcast
Copy link
Contributor

@Rob-Hazelcast I wonder whether I can merge this one now? I'm planning to add more metric mappings (which won't be backported to 5.7.2) and I thought of doing separates PRs for them, as long as I'll be probably adding them in batches.

You could merge this PR (to main) now. The backport label will create another PR against the 5.7 branch. We should not merge that PR until 5.7.2 is released - we should never publish documentation for features/changes that are not yet available.

@anatoly-hazelcast
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah, that's what I thought, regarding pr to 5.7. Once it's there - I'll turn it to draft and will mention you in the PR itself. So, would you mind approving this one so far? :)

@Rob-Hazelcast
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, that's what I thought, regarding pr to 5.7. Once it's there - I'll turn it to draft and will mention you in the PR itself. So, would you mind approving this one so far? :)

Sorry, forgot I hadn't approved already!

@anatoly-hazelcast anatoly-hazelcast merged commit 0db993d into main Apr 9, 2025
6 checks passed
@anatoly-hazelcast anatoly-hazelcast deleted the mc-3230-fix-prometheus-mapping-names branch April 9, 2025 09:59
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 9, 2025

👍 Created #492 to backport into v/5.7.

@oliverhowell oliverhowell restored the mc-3230-fix-prometheus-mapping-names branch May 14, 2025 13:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport to 5.7 Backports to v/5.7
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants