Skip to content

gh-393: Parallel DICES - #392

Closed
JaimeRZP wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
parallel_dices
Closed

gh-393: Parallel DICES#392
JaimeRZP wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
parallel_dices

Conversation

@JaimeRZP

@JaimeRZP JaimeRZP commented Apr 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes: #393

@JaimeRZP JaimeRZP changed the title ruff gh-xxx: Parallel DICES Apr 17, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Apr 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 42.59259% with 31 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
heracles/dices/jackknife.py 42.59% 31 Missing ⚠️
Flag Coverage Δ
py3.10 81.66% <42.59%> (-1.47%) ⬇️
py3.11 81.66% <42.59%> (-1.47%) ⬇️
py3.12 81.62% <42.59%> (-1.47%) ⬇️
py3.13 81.19% <42.59%> (-1.47%) ⬇️
py3.9 81.69% <42.59%> (-1.47%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
heracles/dices/jackknife.py 76.67% <42.59%> (-17.50%) ⬇️
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@JaimeRZP JaimeRZP changed the title gh-xxx: Parallel DICES gh-393: Parallel DICES Apr 17, 2026
@JaimeRZP JaimeRZP closed this May 1, 2026
@JaimeRZP
JaimeRZP deleted the parallel_dices branch May 1, 2026 13:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

DICES Performance is not great

1 participant