Skip to content

feat(1714): mirror node gettransactionrecord response validation#1747

Merged
rozekmichal merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/1714-mirror-node-gettransactionrecord-response-validation
Mar 31, 2026
Merged

feat(1714): mirror node gettransactionrecord response validation#1747
rozekmichal merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/1714-mirror-node-gettransactionrecord-response-validation

Conversation

@rozekmichal
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Issue #1714

@rozekmichal rozekmichal self-assigned this Mar 31, 2026
@rozekmichal rozekmichal requested a review from a team as a code owner March 31, 2026 11:44
@rozekmichal rozekmichal changed the title feat(1714) mirror node gettransactionrecord response validation feat(1714): mirror node gettransactionrecord response validation Mar 31, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Mar 31, 2026

Unit Test Results

1 097 tests  ±0   1 097 ✅ ±0   1m 39s ⏱️ -8s
  113 suites ±0       0 💤 ±0 
    1 files   ±0       0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 5db7a79. ± Comparison against base commit 6ec118a.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Signed-off-by: rozekmichal <michal.rozek@blockydevs.com>
@rozekmichal rozekmichal force-pushed the feat/1714-mirror-node-gettransactionrecord-response-validation branch from b7ba9db to 5db7a79 Compare March 31, 2026 12:02
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Mar 31, 2026

Integration Test Results

37 tests  +37   35 ✅ +35   3m 51s ⏱️ + 3m 51s
21 suites +21    2 💤 + 2 
 1 files   + 1    0 ❌ ± 0 

Results for commit 5db7a79. ± Comparison against base commit 6ec118a.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@rozekmichal rozekmichal merged commit 3bfb547 into main Mar 31, 2026
21 of 22 checks passed
@rozekmichal rozekmichal deleted the feat/1714-mirror-node-gettransactionrecord-response-validation branch March 31, 2026 14:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants