Replace RxJava 2 with RxJava 3.#680
Conversation
|
Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have the users @wilx on file. In order for us to review and merge your code, please sign our Contributor License Agreement to get yourself added. You'll find the CLA and more information here: https://github.com/hivemq/hivemq-community/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.adoc#contributor-license-agreement |
|
Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have the users @wilx on file. In order for us to review and merge your code, please sign our Contributor License Agreement to get yourself added. You'll find the CLA and more information here: https://github.com/hivemq/hivemq-community/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.adoc#contributor-license-agreement |
|
Any updates on this? Rxjava 2 has been out of service for more than 5 years by now and RxJava3 is a drop in replacement in most cases. |
|
I believe I did the CLA. Can anyone re-check? |
|
@cla-bot check |
|
The cla-bot has been summoned, and re-checked this pull request! |
|
I will rebase later today. |
|
I rebased the change set to current master. |
Description
I have started to use the client and it works well for me. But one thing of concern for me is that it uses unmaintained RxJava2. I was wondering if it can be easily replaced. It looks like it mostly is easily replaced.
I did not do any heavy testing though. And one IT test fails locally for me due to some Docker pull error.
I was wondering if you had any plans for moving forward with such RxJava upgrade?
Related Issue
Type of Change
Checklist