fix lora weight merge for vllm (for fixing issue #659)#668
fix lora weight merge for vllm (for fixing issue #659)#668hiyouga merged 4 commits intohiyouga:mainfrom
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request resolves an issue (issue #659) where LoRA weights were not correctly merged for models intended for the vLLM inference engine. It introduces a refined weight merging process that loads the base model, applies LoRA adapters, and then merges them into a dense Hugging Face checkpoint, which is the format expected by vLLM. This ensures seamless integration and correct functionality of LoRA-trained models within a vLLM environment. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a fix for merging LoRA weights, specifically targeting compatibility with the vLLM backend. The changes correctly identify LoRA checkpoints, merge adapter weights into the base model, and save the resulting dense model. The implementation is robust, handling different versions of the peft library and ensuring the model configuration and tokenizer are correctly processed. I've identified a minor opportunity for code simplification to improve maintainability by removing duplicated logic. Overall, this is a good improvement that addresses the issue described.
Fix issue #659.