This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 21, 2025. It is now read-only.
Proposal: cross-chain multisig implementation#120
Draft
Conversation
ACC01ADE
changed the title
Contributor
alexanderattar
left a comment
alexanderattar
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think I need more context on what the planned use for this is. Maybe it was explained earlier and I missed it or need my memory refreshed after the holiday break. Besides that the changes don't really seem to affect current contracts so I think that should be okay. Let's chat about this when there's time @ACC01ADE
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Describe Changes
Proposing a cross-chain multisig implementation.
Checklist before requesting a review