Skip to content

Add charging and preconditioning actions to Teslemetry #144184

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Bre77
Copy link
Contributor

@Bre77 Bre77 commented May 4, 2025

Proposed change

Add charging and preconditioning actions to Teslemetry

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New integration (thank you!)
  • New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
  • Deprecation (breaking change to happen in the future)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
  • This PR is related to issue:
  • Link to documentation pull request:
  • Link to developer documentation pull request:
  • Link to frontend pull request:

Checklist

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • I have followed the development checklist
  • I have followed the perfect PR recommendations
  • The code has been formatted using Ruff (ruff format homeassistant tests)
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

  • The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
    Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
  • New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
    Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
  • For the updated dependencies - a link to the changelog, or at minimum a diff between library versions is added to the PR description.

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

@Bre77 Bre77 changed the title T charge schedule service Add charging and preconditioning actions to Teslemetry May 4, 2025
"name": "Vehicle"
},
"days_of_week": {
"description": "A comma separated list of days this schedule should be enabled. Example: \"Thursday,Saturday\". Also supports \"All\" and \"Weekdays\".",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"A comma-separated …"

Whenever two or more words are combined to form a unit with a single meaning that then modifies a following noun, they become a compound adjective and need to be joined together using a hyphen. (Source)

"name": "Location"
},
"start_enabled": {
"description": "If the vehicle should begin charging at the given start_time.",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the UI the key names are not visible and are translated. So we need the field labels here:

"If the vehicle should begin charging at the given 'Start time'."

Similar for all the field references below.

},
"start_enabled": {
"description": "If the vehicle should begin charging at the given start_time.",
"name": "Start enabled"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But … Instead of separate switches to enable start_time and end_time: Could you instead make both fields optional so they simply come into effect when the user enables them using the check boxes next to them?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants