Small fix to test CLA workflow

[spwoodcock]

What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)

• 🍕 Feature
• 🐛 Bug Fix
• 📝 Documentation
• 🧑‍💻 Refactor
• ✅ Test
• 🤖 Build or CI
• ❓ Other (please specify)

Describe this PR

• Testing CLA signing workflow.

AI Tool Usage

• No AI tools were used
• AI tools were used (complete below)

If AI-assisted:

• Tool(s) used: Codex 5.3
• What was generated: Part of a bigger fix, for testing
• What you reviewed and changed: Code looks fine!

Screenshots

If applicable.

Alternative Approaches Considered

Did you consider other approaches? Why this one?

Review Guide

Notes for the reviewer. How to test this change?

Checklist

• I have read the Contributing Guide
• I have read the Code of Conduct
• PR is focused and small
• Tests are included or updated
• I understand all code in this PR and can answer questions about it
• No secrets, credentials, or sensitive data are included
• Commit messages are descriptive
• Related docs and screenshots are updated

[optional] What gif best describes this PR or how it makes you feel?

[github-actions]

All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅
_{Posted by the CLA Assistant Lite bot.}

[spwoodcock]

I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md document and I hereby sign and agree with the guidelines

[spwoodcock]

recheck