Refactor: Improve task validation wording and layout structure#7210
Open
sumitdahal7 wants to merge 1 commit intohotosm:developfrom
Open
Refactor: Improve task validation wording and layout structure#7210sumitdahal7 wants to merge 1 commit intohotosm:developfrom
sumitdahal7 wants to merge 1 commit intohotosm:developfrom
Conversation
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)
Related Issue
Fixes #7182
Describe this PR
This PR updates the validation status labels in the task selection sidebar to provide clearer feedback for users. The previous "Yes/No" labels for task validation have been replaced with more descriptive messages:
The UI has also been reorganized to use a vertical list for these options, improving readability and alignment. The validatedQuestion paragraph was removed to streamline the interface. These changes address issue #7182.
Screenshots