generated from fastai/nbdev_template
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
fix logprobs handling #5198
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
+15
−7
Closed
fix logprobs handling #5198
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -1234,7 +1234,9 @@ def _generate_single_turn(self, prompts: list): | |
| prompts=prompts, num_generations=num_generations, profiler=profiling_context(self, "vLLM.generate") | ||
| ) | ||
| # vLLM returns per-token top-k logprobs; keep only the top-1 (sampled token) logprob | ||
| logprobs = [[lp[0] for lp in seq] for seq in logprobs] | ||
| if isinstance(logprobs[0][0], list): | ||
|
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I don't "really" like this check since it depends on a lot of nesting. Open to a better way to handle this guard. |
||
| # reduce when we request logprobs > 0 from vllm and they are returned as a list per position | ||
| logprobs = [[lp[0] for lp in seq] for seq in logprobs] | ||
|
|
||
| elif self.use_transformers_paged: | ||
| if is_conversational({"prompt": prompts[0]}): | ||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
no so sure about this change, I think it's always
list[list[list[float]]]:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
wait a sec, isn't it a behavioural change from vLLM?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what if you don't pass logprobs at all?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
server side error:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
or
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree, i think it's always
list[list[list[float]]]. Or actually, it should belist[list[list[float]]] | None, and vllm_serve should correctly return None when passing logprobs=None, right now it crashes as Quentin noted.