-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
Technical Strategy and Planning (WORK IN PROGRESS)
- Create a venue for the open sharing of knowledge about the unique interoperability needs of regulated financial networks, both amongst such networks and with those building interoperability solutions
- Encourage definition of industry standards that meet these users' needs, paying attention to the business and legal constraints they face as well as technical correctness and operability
- Engage constructively with relevant communities and bodies implementing and defining interoperability standards to help ensure their work reflects these needs
- Facilitate the adoption of these standards and approaches by underlying platforms. This can include providing a home for reference code where it does not exist elsewhere as well as helping maintainers of different platforms to coordinate for the purposes of interoperability testing, etc.
- Maintain a focus on pragmatic approaches, grounded in real-life projects; avoid unnecessary theory, abstractions or complexity; when in doubt, use the industry’s need for a standardised, widely accepted and correct protocol for atomic (all or nothing) delivery-versus-payment of digital assets and cash between Corda- and EVM-based networks as a ‘north star’.
- Dispel the perception that those building regulated DLT networks - financial institutions or platform vendors - are closed; demonstrate through our actions that we are open and collaborative; seek out likeminded organisations.
Important note: the objectives above can be achieved in a number of ways and so we deliberately do not have a clear view on what the final deliverables or outputs of Harmonia will be. Harmonia is a means to the ends listed above, not an end in itself
We envisage two parallel streams of work initially: awareness and community building, and execution against the objectives.
There are many existing communities and groups with whom we desire to collaborate - interoperability projects, industry special interest groups, in-flight projects in need of interoperability, etc. Here, we list those whom we desire to meet in the coming weeks
- Interoperability Projects (Offer to present on their calls, etc)
- Hyperledger Cacti
- Yui
- EEA Cross-chain Interop Working Group
- Soda?
- Industry-specific groupings and consumers
- Hyperledger Financial Markets Special Interest Group
- Operators and users of regulated DLT networks
- Who else?
- Converse with the broader community where they meet
- RLN, BIS groups, etc
- Who else?
The core purpose of Harmonia is to create a venue for the open sharing of knowledge about the unique interoperability needs of regulated financial networks. As such, our work will fall broadly into three groups: capturing the knowledge, including reconciling and synthesising multiple perspectives; sharing and communicating these insights with those whose projects can benefit from them; and fostering the development of code (samples, libraries, reference implementations) that can be used by others to accelerate their work.
At a high level, we will execute this work as follows
- Capturing and synthesising knowledge
- Making direct contributions to the documentation repo and encouraging others to do so
- Actively editing, integrating and reconciling the contributed documentation
- Running a series of ‘workshop’ calls where contentious issues or those requiring broader discussion are surfaced. See below for sample topics
- Sharing knowledge
- Blog posts
- Presentations to other groups
- Meetups?
- Developing code
- R3
- JVM implementation of Merkle-Patricia Trie
- Second draft of white paper
- Adhara
- Clean-room implementation of solidity contracts
- Write-up of what the contract is doing when it inspects the contents of a Corda transaction
- Deterministic cancellation of a settlement… the ‘happy unhappy path'
- Need a plan to bring the two pieces together… hackathon… include externals?
- Review the above
- Draft Contribution Guidelines
- Draft roadmap
- Agree ownership roles and responsibilities for the repo and Discord
- Populate Issues list
- Investigate CI/CD
- Schedule regular technical team catch-up call
- Write down plan to bring the two pieces together so we can demonstrate publicly end-to-end, including agreeing on the default Corda Contract type to use in the repo.
- Discuss if/when/how a hackathon would be appropriate
- Options for standardising how to locate metadata (eg overarching ‘agreement ID’) in a foreign network’s data structures without compromising the ‘avoid tight binding’ principle
- Concrete example: EVM introspection of a Corda transaction. Some part of the standardisation could enable the inclusion of some data (eg tx reference) inside a serialised Corda transaction, so the EVM side has a single way to check a particular Corda transaction relates to a specific business agreement without needing to know anything else about its structure (and without being dependent on the contract types). Including security discussion
- Joint ‘therapy’ session for the sharing of real-life war stories from those installing enterprise blockchain nodes inside corporate firewalls.
- Enumeration of common non-negotiable requirements
- Where (and in what way) can standardisation or common components make this work easier
- Introduce the ‘four interface’ model (interop, HSM, network-side, bank-side)
- “Give business / implementer community confidence about what does and doesn’t work”?
- Enumerate the issues the banks are facing, constraints they face operationally and with integration to/from payment/treasury/etc systems
- ‘Vicarious trust’ - Introduction and evaluation of where and when it can and cannot be applied