Skip to content

Conversation

@mblaze-da
Copy link
Contributor

fixes #3488

[static]

Signed-off-by: Mateusz Błażejewski <mateusz.blazejewski@digitalasset.com>
@mblaze-da
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm not sure if I should account here for resources from splitwell and sv-canton as well.

@mblaze-da mblaze-da marked this pull request as draft January 9, 2026 14:43
@mblaze-da mblaze-da marked this pull request as ready for review January 9, 2026 15:15
@martinflorian-da
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not sure if I should account here for resources from splitwell and sv-canton as well.

Argh sorry for taking so long to get to this...

splitwell

Irrelevant for SVs

sv-canton

Super relevant for SVs... so we definitely need the version of that (for a given SV) to match the version we're deploying (for that SV) from canton-network...

Copy link
Contributor

@martinflorian-da martinflorian-da left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks very reasonable so far, thank you! Not entirely opposed to merging this without sv-canton for now, for smaller PRs. Up to you... (not approving in case you decide to make a bigger PR).

In any case: I'd strongly suggest doing a hdm test before merging anything related to versions...

Also some thoughts on sv-canton, for when you get to it:

  • you probably want to ignore the override when deploying legacy or upgrade nodes, and apply it only on active; not sure if this will ever matter in practice, but semantics-wise it seems most reasonable that way?
  • it might be a candidate for a unit test to make sure the override gets applied to all deployed releases where it matters (participant and splice-global-domain...); you'll probably be in a better position to judge whether it's worth it

@martinflorian-da
Copy link
Contributor

fixes

Consider confirming that this works as expected at least once manually before claiming that.

[static]

Signed-off-by: Mateusz Błażejewski <mateusz.blazejewski@digitalasset.com>
[static]

Signed-off-by: Mateusz Błażejewski <mateusz.blazejewski@digitalasset.com>
@mblaze-da
Copy link
Contributor Author

A test here seems like a good idea. To do that I'd need #3507 merged first though.

@mblaze-da
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hdm_test

@github-actions
Copy link

Deploy HDM pipeline triggered for Commit ce466931786248a94fd80c5283e894ffe548e752 in , please contact a Contributor to approve it in CircleCI: https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/DACH-NY/canton-network-internal/47546

@mblaze-da
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hdm_test

@github-actions
Copy link

Deploy HDM pipeline triggered for Commit ce466931786248a94fd80c5283e894ffe548e752 in , please contact a Contributor to approve it in CircleCI: https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/DACH-NY/canton-network-internal/47722

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implement version override per SV

3 participants