Skip to content

Merge maintenance-9.x to master #2503

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
sensei-hacker merged 6 commits into from
Dec 26, 2025
Merged

Merge maintenance-9.x to master #2503

sensei-hacker merged 6 commits into from
Dec 26, 2025

Conversation

@sensei-hacker
Copy link
Member

@sensei-hacker sensei-hacker commented Dec 24, 2025

Summary

Merge maintenance-9.x branch changes into master.

Changes included

@sensei-hacker
Merge pull request #2499 from iNavFlight/master
3b32d36 
Merge build fix from master to maintenance-9.x
@sensei-hacker
Update SITL binaries for 9.0.0-RC4
26b1e84 
- Linux x64: Built locally with glibc 2.34 for Ubuntu 22.04 LTS compatibility
- Linux arm64: From CI
- macOS: From CI
- Windows: From CI (includes cygwin1.dll from PR #11203)
@sensei-hacker
Merge pull request #2500 from sensei-hacker/update-sitl-9.0.0-rc4
c2007bc 
Update SITL binaries for 9.0.0-RC4
@sensei-hacker
reset state if processData throws, so the CRC isn't re-entered
c9f8d59
@sensei-hacker
Fix incorrect send_message parameter in loadLogicConditions
b1f1f3d 
The 5th parameter of MSP.send_message() is protocolVersion (a number),
not an error callback. Passing a function caused 'Invalid MSP protocol
version' exception which propagated to the isolated context, breaking
serial communication until reconnect.
@sensei-hacker
Merge pull request #2502 from sensei-hacker/fix_double_crc
d0ded94 
Fix MSP decoder state corruption and send_message parameter error
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 24, 2025

Branch Targeting Suggestion

You've targeted the master branch with this PR. Please consider if a version branch might be more appropriate:

  • maintenance-9.x - If your change is backward-compatible and won't create compatibility issues between INAV firmware and Configurator 9.x versions. This will allow your PR to be included in the next 9.x release.

  • maintenance-10.x - If your change introduces compatibility requirements between firmware and configurator that would break 9.x compatibility. This is for PRs which will be included in INAV 10.x

If master is the correct target for this change, no action is needed.

This is an automated suggestion to help route contributions to the appropriate branch.

@sensei-hacker sensei-hacker merged commit a869ede into master Dec 26, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@sensei-hacker