Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v0.2 improvements #299

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Mar 14, 2025
Merged

v0.2 improvements #299

merged 10 commits into from
Mar 14, 2025

Conversation

hu55a1n1
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@hu55a1n1 hu55a1n1 marked this pull request as ready for review March 12, 2025 20:19
@hu55a1n1 hu55a1n1 requested a review from dangush March 13, 2025 19:09
@hu55a1n1 hu55a1n1 merged commit dbf294f into main Mar 14, 2025
8 checks passed
@hu55a1n1 hu55a1n1 deleted the hu55a1n1/v0_2-improvements branch March 14, 2025 20:18
@MSalopek MSalopek restored the hu55a1n1/v0_2-improvements branch March 15, 2025 19:14
@MSalopek
Copy link

Undeleted the branch because I had issues building the native bindings and contracts.

The branch was referenced in the lockfiles so putting it back resolved the issue.

Alternatively, we can use the commithash from main in the lockfiles.

@hu55a1n1
Copy link
Member Author

Right! Sorry about that, I should have used the commit hash. I fixed this (so we now depend on main) in the solver keygen PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants