Skip to content

Conversation

@Michael-Kolpakov
Copy link
Contributor

@Michael-Kolpakov Michael-Kolpakov commented Mar 10, 2025

Tickets

Code reviewers

Summary of issue

  • The active navigation arrow doesn't change the color to dark grey (#C4C4C4).

Summary of change

  • Now added a change in the color of the slider scroll buttons when hovering over them.

CHECK LIST

  • СI passed
  • Сode coverage >=95%
  • PR is reviewed manually again (to make sure you have 100% ready code)
  • All reviewers agreed to merge the PR
  • I've checked new feature as logged in and logged out user if needed
  • PR meets all conventions

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style
    • Refined the slider’s visual cues by updating the arrow icons to feature a brighter look on default and a darker appearance on hover for improved user experience.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 10, 2025

Note

Reviews paused

Use the following commands to manage reviews:

  • @coderabbitai resume to resume automatic reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a single review.

Walkthrough

This update refines the styles for the SlickSlider feature. The modifications involve removing unnecessary blank lines and changing the image paths for the slider arrow icons. The default state now points to a brighter icon, while the hover state uses a darker variant. No public or exported entities were altered.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/.../SlickSlider.styles.scss Removed extraneous blank lines; updated CSS for .slick-prev and .slick-next with new image paths for both default (brighter) and hover (darker) states.

Suggested reviewers

  • vlad-zhadan
  • YuliiaAndreieva
  • ilko-dev

Poem

In the realm of code, a tweak takes flight,
Arrows now beam with a fresher light,
Blank lines vanish without a trace,
Styling refined with a touch of grace,
Cheers to progress, smooth and bright!


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Michael-Kolpakov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai ignore

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
src/features/SlickSlider/SlickSlider.styles.scss (6)

21-25: Formatting Adjustments in .slick-next, .slick-prev Block
The modifications around lines 21–25 appear to be related to formatting/whitespace adjustments. While these changes do not affect functionality, please confirm that they align with the project’s style guidelines for consistency.


44-55: Review of Disabled Arrow Styling
In the .slick-disabled block, the rules for &:before and &:hover:before (lines 46, 51–52) ensure a consistent disabled state by applying the base filter. Please verify that allowing a hover selector—even if it applies the same filter—is the intended behavior for disabled elements.


68-88: Slider Container Formatting Consistency
The minor formatting changes within the .slider-item-container block (notably at lines 70, 75, 80, and 88) seem aimed at improving readability and structure. Please double-check that these adjustments do not alter the layout or styling behavior in any unintended way.


113-123: Duplicate CSS Declarations in .slick-prev Pseudo-elements
Within the .slick-prev block, duplicate content property declarations are present in the &::before (lines 114–115) and &:hover::before blocks (lines 120–121). Removing the redundant declarations can help streamline the stylesheet and avoid any potential confusion. Also, ensure that the new image paths correctly reflect the desired brighter and darker icons.


127-139: Duplicate CSS Declarations in .slick-next Pseudo-elements
Similarly, in the .slick-next block, the &::before (lines 130–131) and &:hover::before (lines 136–137) sections contain duplicate content property assignments. Removing these duplicates will make the code cleaner. Please also ensure that the new paths for the right arrow icons are correct and display as intended on hover.


154-154: Media Query Block Verification
Line 154 shows an isolated modification within the media query block. Please review this change to ensure it is intentional and does not inadvertently affect the responsive styling.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ee01e12 and 4864f60.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
  • src/assets/images/utils/LeftSmallSliderArrowBrighter.svg is excluded by !**/*.svg
  • src/assets/images/utils/LeftSmallSliderArrowDarker.svg is excluded by !**/*.svg
  • src/assets/images/utils/RightSmallSliderArrowBrighter.svg is excluded by !**/*.svg
  • src/assets/images/utils/RightSmallSliderArrowDarker.svg is excluded by !**/*.svg
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/features/SlickSlider/SlickSlider.styles.scss (6 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Jenkins

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 10, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Reviews paused.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@YaroslavRosnovskyi YaroslavRosnovskyi changed the base branch from release/1.2.2 to release/1.2.3 March 11, 2025 11:52
@ihor-yatsyshyn ihor-yatsyshyn self-requested a review April 17, 2025 08:53
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants