Skip to content

Adding "generated" to the list of accepted param flags.#17

Open
msdemlei wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
add-dynamic-content-flag
Open

Adding "generated" to the list of accepted param flags.#17
msdemlei wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
add-dynamic-content-flag

Conversation

@msdemlei
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Also, opening the PR cycle.

Sorry about the ivoatex-related whitespace changes that are in here. Can you pretend they are not there? The real change to review is in the XSD, everything else is just noise.

@msdemlei
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Oh, this is trying to address ivoa-std/TAP#11, too.

@mbtaylor
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@msdemlei, since PR #16, now approved, has a load of whitespace noise in the .tex file too, presumably the same changes, how about merging that first and then rebasing this on top of it?

@msdemlei msdemlei force-pushed the add-dynamic-content-flag branch from a7521ba to b8d9acf Compare April 16, 2026 07:58
@msdemlei msdemlei force-pushed the add-dynamic-content-flag branch from b8d9acf to 323d3e0 Compare April 16, 2026 07:59
@msdemlei
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

msdemlei commented Apr 16, 2026 via email

@mbtaylor
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Content of the PR looks OK, but I haven't approved so far since it's not clear that discussions on the DAL list about nomenclature of the proposed new flag have reached conclusion.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@mbtaylor mbtaylor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll give it an approval, on the grounds that the commit looks OK. But given the fact that there has been not-obviously-unanimous discussion on nomenclature, I'd give it a week or two in case anybody dislikes no-where enough to argue further here or on-list.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@gmantele gmantele left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks fine to me.
And I am not against waiting the time recommended by @mbtaylor (1-2 weeks).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants